Measurement of Length between Bronchial Carina and Superior Vena Cava-right Atrial Junction for Optimal Positioning of Central Venous Catheters in the Korean Adult Population

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-132
Author(s):  
Jung Bum Hong ◽  
Eun Ho Shin ◽  
Young Kyun Kim ◽  
Ji Sun Park ◽  
Jang Yong Kim ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Kwon ◽  
K. H. Kim ◽  
H. G. Ryu ◽  
C. W. Jung ◽  
J. M. Goo ◽  
...  

To reduce the possibility of cardiac tamponade, a rare but lethal complication of central venous catheters, the tip of the central venous catheter should be located above the cephalic limit of the pericardial reflection, not only above the superior vena cava-right atrium junction. This study was performed to measure the superior vena cava lengths above and below the pericardial reflection in cardiac surgical patients. Cardiac surgical patients (n=61; 27 male), whose age [mean±SD (range)] was 47±15 (15–75) years, were studied. The intrapericardial and extrapericardial lengths, and the length of the medial duplicated part were measured separately. The whole vertical lengths of the superior vena cava on either side were calculated respectively by adding the intra-and extrapericardial and medial duplication lengths. The lateral extrapericardial was 29.1±6.5 (Mean±SD) (9–49) mm (range), and lateral extrapericardial length was 32.6±6.9 (20–53) mm. The medial extrapericardial length was 23.3±5.0 (11–39) mm, medical duplicated length was 7.2±3.3 (4–20) mm, and medial intrapericardial was 28.3±7.0 (20–52) mm. The averaged superior vena cava length of both sides was 60.3±9.0 (44.5–90) mm. Almost half of the superior vena cava was found to be within the pericardium and half out. This information may be helpful in deciding how far a central venous catheter should be withdrawn beyond the superior vena cava-right atrial junction during right atrial electrocardiographic guided insertion, and in the prediction of optimal central venous catheter insertion depth.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282198933
Author(s):  
Pablo V. Uceda ◽  
Julio Peralta Rodriguez ◽  
Hernán Vela ◽  
Adelina Lozano Miranda ◽  
Luis Vega Salvatierra ◽  
...  

The health care system in Peru treats 15,000 dialysis patients annually. Approximately 45% of patients receive therapy using catheters. The incidence of catheter-induced superior vena cava (SVC) occlusion is increasing along with its associated significant morbidity and vascular access dysfunction. One of the unusual manifestations of this complication is bleeding “downhill” esophageal varices caused by reversal of blood flow through esophageal veins around the obstruction to the right atrium. Herein is presented the case of an 18-year-old woman on hemodialysis complicated by SVC occlusion and bleeding esophageal varices who underwent successful endovascular recanalization of the SVC. Bleeding from “downhill” esophageal varices should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dialysis patients exposed to central venous catheters. Aggressive endovascular treatment of SVC occlusion is recommended to preserve upper extremity access function and prevent bleeding from this complication.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 400-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Bader ◽  
Peter Bromley ◽  
Ingo Jester ◽  
James Bennett ◽  
G. Suren Arul

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-229
Author(s):  
LeRoy Graham ◽  
Carl H. Gumbiner

Complications of central venous catheterization are well described. They include right atrial thrombosis and superior vena cava syndrome resulting from impaired venous drainage. Such complications are normally observed while the catheter is in place. They are often transient, resolving upon catheter removal. A patient with recurrent signs of superior vena caval obstruction 1½ years after removal of the central venous catheter is described. The obstruction was determined to be intermittent and functionally related to elevated cardiac output due, in turn, to anemia. This patient was also found to have a calcific right atrial thrombus which was not obstructive.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Marina Cornacchiari ◽  
Roberto Ferraresi ◽  
Barbara Gidaro ◽  
Antonia Stasi ◽  
Maria Giuseppina Ponticelli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
Vasileios Zochios ◽  
Michael Gilhooly ◽  
Simon Fenner

Purpose The subclavian vein is thought to be the most appropriate route for central venous access in major maxillofacial surgery. Evidence suggests that left-sided central venous catheters should lie below the carina and be angulated at less than 40° to superior vena cava wall. This reduces perforation risk. With this in mind we audited our current practice for placement of central venous catheters for major maxillofacial surgery. The criteria against which we compared our practice were: 1) all catheter tips should lie below the carina and 2) the angle of the distal 1 cm of the catheter should be no more than 40° to the superior vena cava wall. Methods Left subclavian central venous catheters placed on a weekly operating list between September 2005 and August 2008 were identified retrospectively: 83 patients were identified; 22 were excluded. The angle of the central venous catheter tip and distance from the carina were measured on the first post-procedure chest-X ray. All central venous catheters used were 16 cm long. Results 82% of the catheter tips were located above the carina while 61% were angulated at greater than 40°; 11% of central venous catheters met both standards; 14% of central venous catheters placed by a consultant and 12% of catheters placed by a trainee met both standards. Conclusions 89% of the central venous catheters were not correctly placed. The majority of central venous catheter tips above the carina were at an adverse angle to the superior vena cava wall. We suggest that for left subclavian central lines, 20 cm catheters be used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document