Taylor, Colin F., and Hugh A. Dempsey (eds.): The People of the Buffalo. The Plains Indians of North America. Military Art, Warfare, and Change

Anthropos ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-658
Author(s):  
Dagmar Siebelt
Nature ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 198 (4881) ◽  
pp. 697-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES F. MOHN ◽  
REGINALD M. LAMBERT ◽  
CHESTER M. ZMIJEWSKI

1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
Douglas Edward Leach ◽  
Carl Ortwin Sauer

1972 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
David Freeman Hawke ◽  
Carl Ortwin Sauer

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Eileen M. Antone

AbstractSince humanities arise from a specific place and from the people of that place, this article will focus on Peacemaker’s revolutionary teachings about the seed of law. Long before the people from across the ocean arrived here on Turtle Island (North America) there was much warfare happening. According to John Mohawk (2001, para. 1), an Iroquoian social historian, “[t]he people had been at war for so long that some were born knowing they had enemies [but] not knowing why they had enemies”. Peacemaker planted the seeds of peace which resulted in the Kayenla’kowa, the Great Law of Peace (n. d.), which is the basis of the Hotinosh^ni Confederacy. With the burial of the weapons of war under the Great Tree of Peace the Hotinosh^ni were able to develop their rituals and ceremonies to reflect their relationship with creation. This peaceful confederacy was disrupted shortly after the Europeans arrived with their violent imperialistic ways of life. The 1996 Royal Commission on Aboriginal People (RCAP) documented the situation of Aboriginal communities, which was the result of oppressive policies and programs of colonialism. The RCAP also captured the many different voices of the Aboriginal people in their struggle to revitalise their traditional teachings that will make them strong again.


Horizons ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-53
Author(s):  
Brian P. Flanagan

ABSTRACTThis article looks at two major metaphors used in contemporary ecclesiology, the church as “the People of God” and as “the Bride of Christ,” which have functioned in some of the polarizing debates within the Catholic Church in North America. It then suggests some methodological reasons why reliance upon metaphors in ecclesiology, either through the balancing of different metaphors or the promotion of a dominant metaphor, is inadequate to the task of understanding the church systematically. It then suggests some avenues for future ecclesiological method that may help to understand the church better and so to respond better to contemporary ecclesiological debates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document