scholarly journals Comment on “Entanglement and the Thermodynamic Arrow of Time” and Correct Reply on “Comment on "Quantum Solution to the Arrow-of-Time Dilemma"” of David Jennings and Terry Rudolph

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 209-213
Author(s):  
Kupervasser Oleg
Author(s):  
Donald C. Williams

This chapter is about the arrow or direction of time against the backdrop of the pure manifold theory. It is accepted that the fact that time has a direction ought to be explained. It is proposed that the arrow of time is grounded in deeper facts about the four-dimensional nature of each object in the manifold and in facts about the overall four-dimensional shape of the universe. Towards the end of the chapter the possibility of time travel is discussed. It is argued that time travel is metaphysically possible and that there is a reasonable and intelligible sense in which a time traveler can and cannot change the past, according to the pure manifold theory.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Nathan Argaman

Quantum physics is surprising in many ways. One surprise is the threat to locality implied by Bell’s Theorem. Another surprise is the capacity of quantum computation, which poses a threat to the complexity-theoretic Church-Turing thesis. In both cases, the surprise may be due to taking for granted a strict arrow-of-time assumption whose applicability may be limited to the classical domain. This possibility has been noted repeatedly in the context of Bell’s Theorem. The argument concerning quantum computation is described here. Further development of models which violate this strong arrow-of-time assumption, replacing it by a weaker arrow which is yet to be identified, is called for.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67
Author(s):  
Ghenadie Mardari

The phenomenon of quantum erasure exposed a remarkable ambiguity in the interpretation of quantum entanglement. On the one hand, the data is compatible with the possibility of arrow-of-time violations. On the other hand, it is also possible that temporal non-locality is an artifact of post-selection. Twenty years later, this problem can be solved with a quantum monogamy experiment, in which four entangled quanta are measured in a delayed-choice arrangement. If Bell violations can be recovered from a “monogamous” quantum system, then the arrow of time is obeyed at the quantum level.


1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. L155-L160 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Goldwirth ◽  
T Piran
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-235
Author(s):  
D. Gavinsky

The Hidden Subgroup Problem (HSP) has been widely studied in the context of quantum computing and is known to be efficiently solvable for Abelian groups, yet appears to be difficult for many non-Abelian ones. An efficient algorithm for the HSP over a group \f G\ runs in time polynomial in \f{n\deq\log|G|.} For any subgroup \f H\ of \f G, let \f{N(H)} denote the normalizer of \f H. Let \MG\ denote the intersection of all normalizers in \f G (i.e., \f{\MG=\cap_{H\leq G}N(H)}). \MG\ is always a subgroup of \f G and the index \f{[G:\MG]} can be taken as a measure of ``how non-Abelian'' \f G is (\f{[G:\MG] = 1} for Abelian groups). This measure was considered by Grigni, Schulman, Vazirani and Vazirani, who showed that whenever \f{[G:\MG]\in\exp(O(\log^{1/2}n))} the corresponding HSP can be solved efficiently (under certain assumptions). We show that whenever \f{[G:\MG]\in\poly(n)} the corresponding HSP can be solved efficiently, under the same assumptions (actually, we solve a slightly more general case of the HSP and also show that some assumptions may be relaxed).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahrokh Heidari ◽  
Mitchell Rogers ◽  
Patrice Delmas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document