scholarly journals Immunisation status of children up to 15 years of age

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harshal Dhabe ◽  
Kruti Dhaval Gandhi ◽  
Monali T Bhorge
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 772-780
Author(s):  
Gerben Keijzers ◽  
Amy Sweeny ◽  
Julia Crilly ◽  
Norm Good ◽  
Cate M Cameron ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Miles ◽  
Chris Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl_A) ◽  
pp. 40A-40A
Author(s):  
LT van Waes ◽  
Z Nugent ◽  
EL Ford-Jones ◽  
P Caulford

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Angela Bechini ◽  
Sara Boccalini ◽  
Ilaria Rancan ◽  
Luisa Galli ◽  
Beatrice Zanella ◽  
...  

Internationally Adopted Children (IAC) often show suboptimal immunisation coverage, but available data are discordant. Data at the first evaluation of 2073 IAC (median age: 6 years) referred to the Meyer Children’s University Hospital (Florence, Italy) in 2009–2019 were analysed in order to evaluate their immunisation status against diphtheria, tetanus, and hepatitis B. Negative antibody titres were observed in 11.5% of the IAC for diphtheria, 18.6% for tetanus, and 39.0% for hepatitis B. At multivariate analysis, originating from Africa was an independent risk factor for seronegativity for the three diseases (p < 0.001), while age below four years was an independent factor associated with protective immunity, only considering hepatitis B (p < 0.001). Vaccine documentation was an additional factor independently associated with protective immunity. However, a discrepancy between documentation (indicating previous vaccinations) and serology (showing negative antibody titres) was evidenced in 3.8% of the children for diphtheria, 12.6% for tetanus, and 29.6% for hepatitis B. This finding suggests that although vaccine documentation may reflect the presence of protective antibody titres, it should not be accepted as absolute evidence of protective immunity, underlining the importance of a complete assessment of immunisation status in IAC, particularly in those originating from Africa and aged over four years.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Kanchan Thapa ◽  
Bhim Raj Suwal ◽  
Pratik Adhikary

Introduction: Immunisation is a cost-effective public health intervention worldwide responsible for the reduction of infant and child morbidity and mortality. Full immunisation is a state of obtaining all vaccination according to the Immunisation schedule of Nepal. Methods: The secondary data of Nepal was downloaded from the DHS Program. A total of 1709 children aged 16-23 months were analysed for descriptive statistics. All the analyses were weighted by its sampling weight. The full immunisation status indicates those who completed 1 dose of BCG, 3 doses of Polio, 3 doses of DPT and 1 dose of Measles. The independent variables are further subdivided into enabling, predisposing and external environmental factors. Results: Over half of children (52.6%) were from Terai, nearly a quarter (23.0%) from province 2. More males (53.5%) and the majority of (86.1%) children with birth order one to three were immunised. Mother aged < 20 years (62%), working father (96.1%), working mother (59.7%), educated father (87.3%) and educated mother (70.7%) had children with complete immunisation. Non-smoker mother (94.6%) had fully immunised children. Nearly three quarters (73.5%) from a middle and rich family, those with PNC within 3 days (35.9%), delivered at a health facility (64.2%), and had PNC check from the skilled provider (12.1%) had completely immunised their children. Conclusions: Significant differences based on external environment, enabling factors and predisposing factors for full immunisation status was observed. Specific interventions based on these factors are recommended.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Tuffrey ◽  
Fiona Finlay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document