scholarly journals Protein complex similarity based on Weisfeiler-Lehman labeling

Author(s):  
Bianca K Stöcker ◽  
Till Schäfer ◽  
Petra Mutzel ◽  
Johannes Köster ◽  
Nils Kriege ◽  
...  

Being able to quantify the similarity between two protein complexes is essential for numerous applications. Prominent examples are database searches for known complexes with a given query complex, comparison of the output of different protein complex prediction algorithms, or summarizing and clustering protein complexes, e.g., for visualization. While the corresponding problems have received much attention on single proteins and protein families, the question about how to model and compute similarity between protein complexes has not yet been systematically studied. Because protein complexes can be naturally modeled as graphs, in principle general graph similarity measures may be used, but these are often computationally hard to obtain and do not take typical properties of protein complexes into account. Here we propose a parametric family of similarity measures based on Weisfeiler-Lehman labeling. We evaluate it on simulated complexes of the extended human integrin adhesome network. Because the connectivity (graph topology) of real complexes is often unknown and hard to obtain experimentally, we use both known protein-protein interaction networks and known interdependencies (constraints) between interactions to simulate more realistic complexes than from interaction networks alone. We empirically show that the defined family of similarity measures is in good agreement with edit similarity, a similarity measure derived from graph edit distance, but can be much more efficiently computed. It can therefore be used in large-scale studies and simulations and serve as a basis for further refinements of modeling protein complex similarity.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca K Stöcker ◽  
Till Schäfer ◽  
Petra Mutzel ◽  
Johannes Köster ◽  
Nils Kriege ◽  
...  

Being able to quantify the similarity between two protein complexes is essential for numerous applications. Prominent examples are database searches for known complexes with a given query complex, comparison of the output of different protein complex prediction algorithms, or summarizing and clustering protein complexes, e.g., for visualization. While the corresponding problems have received much attention on single proteins and protein families, the question about how to model and compute similarity between protein complexes has not yet been systematically studied. Because protein complexes can be naturally modeled as graphs, in principle general graph similarity measures may be used, but these are often computationally hard to obtain and do not take typical properties of protein complexes into account. Here we propose a parametric family of similarity measures based on Weisfeiler-Lehman labeling. We evaluate it on simulated complexes of the extended human integrin adhesome network. Because the connectivity (graph topology) of real complexes is often unknown and hard to obtain experimentally, we use both known protein-protein interaction networks and known interdependencies (constraints) between interactions to simulate more realistic complexes than from interaction networks alone. We empirically show that the defined family of similarity measures is in good agreement with edit similarity, a similarity measure derived from graph edit distance, but can be much more efficiently computed. It can therefore be used in large-scale studies and simulations and serve as a basis for further refinements of modeling protein complex similarity.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Koutroumpas ◽  
François Képès

Identification of protein complexes from proteomic experiments is crucial to understand not only their function but also the principles of cellular organization. Advances in experimental techniques have enabled the construction of large-scale protein-protein interaction networks, and computational methods have been developed to analyze high-throughput data. In most cases several parameters are introduced that have to be trained before application. But how do we select the parameter values when there are no training data available? How many data do we need to properly train a method. How is the performance of a method affected when we incorrectly select the parameter values? The above questions, although important to determine the applicability of a method, are most of the time overlooked. We highlight the importance of such an analysis by investigating how limited knowledge, in the form of incomplete training data, affects the performance of parametric protein-complex prediction algorithms. Furthermore, we develop a simple non-parametric method that does not rely on the existence of training data and we compare it with the parametric alternatives. Using datasets from yeast and fly we demonstrate that parametric methods trained with limited data provide sub-optimal predictions, while our non-parametric method performs better or is on par with the parametric alternatives. Overall, our analysis questions, at least for the specific problem, whether parametric methods provide significantly better results than non-parametric ones to justify the additional effort for applying them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document