3 The Diary of “Helena Morley” (Elizabeth Bishop, trans.)

B-Side Books ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ferry
Keyword(s):  
PMLA ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-257
Author(s):  
David R. Jarraway

A general reluctance to engage the issue of lesbian identity in Elizabeth Bishop's work has understandably been conditioned by her own longstanding reticence. An approach that theorizes about the nonreferential, hence inarticulable, contours of Bishop's project, however, discloses a more eroticized aesthetic practice—one conceivably enabling the vital exploration of transgressive sexuality that perhaps goes without saying. What arguably forges the link between theory and practice is Bishop's experience of loss. The unspeakableness of mother loss due to insanity, mediated poignantly by the curtailment of Bishop's Canadian childhood, formerly provided the invitation to enclose Bishop's writing explicitly within a lifelong travail of itinerant displacement. Recent psychoanalytic theory, by contrast, foregrounds a more challenging loss that divides her writing between reality and the real and thus implicitly opens it up to a spectral lesbian poetics beyond what her canonical “American” identity readily permits readers to see and to say.


1977 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Candace Slater
Keyword(s):  

1977 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Ross Taylor
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74
Author(s):  
Christopher Laverty

This essay examines the influence of Elizabeth Bishop on Seamus Heaney’s poetics in the 1980s and 1990s as he became a global poet. She stands as a unique and overlooked exemplar in Heaney’s poetic pantheon. His reading of Bishop’s work, for all its limitations, nonetheless enables some of his most celebrated poetry of “home.” Since the 1990s, Bishop’s reputation has grown considerably, and recent critical assessments of newly published work have led to new ways of reading her older collections, so that the “reticence” for which she was famed now appears less as an aesthetic principle—as Heaney understands it—than as a concession to a repressive environment. Through intertextual close-readings alongside an examination of Heaney’s literarycritical responses to her work, this essay argues Heaney’s view of Bishop is often refracted through the lens of his own concerns. Ultimately, however, that view helps Heaney develop a poetics where form itself—the essential border-making and border-crossing apparatus—is emblematic of a solution to political crisis, making his misreading a highly productive one.


2011 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Alistair Noon
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Cristina Nogueira
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document