Accuracy of Electronically Reported “Meaningful Use” Clinical Quality Measures

2013 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Kern ◽  
Sameer Malhotra ◽  
Yolanda Barrón ◽  
Jill Quaresimo ◽  
Rina Dhopeshwarkar ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 864-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S Ancker ◽  
Lisa M Kern ◽  
Alison Edwards ◽  
Sarah Nosal ◽  
Daniel M Stein ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Contemporary electronic health records (EHRs) offer a wide variety of features, creating opportunities to influence healthcare quality in different ways. This study was designed to assess the relationship between physician use of individual EHR functions and healthcare quality. Materials and Methods Sixty-five providers eligible for “meaningful use” were included. Data were abstracted from office visit records during the study timeframe (183 095 visits with 61 977 patients). Three EHR functions were considered potential predictors: acceptance of best practice alerts, use of order sets, and viewing panel-level reports. Eighteen clinical quality measures from the “meaningful use” program were abstracted. Results Use of condition-specific best-practice alerts and order sets was associated with better scores on clinical quality measures capturing processes in diabetes, cancer screening, tobacco cessation, and pneumonia vaccination. For example, providers above the median in use of tobacco-related alerts had higher performance on tobacco cessation intervention metrics (median 80.6% vs. 66.7%; P < .001), and providers above the median in use of diabetes order sets had higher quality on diabetes low density lipoprotein (LDL) testing (68.2% vs. 59.5%; P == .001). Post hoc examination of the results showed that the positive associations were with measures of healthcare processes (such as rates of LDL testing), whereas there were no positive associations with measures of healthcare outcomes (such as LDL levels). Discussion Among primary care providers in the ambulatory setting using a single EHR, intensive use of certain EHR functions was associated with increased adherence to recommended care as measured by performance on electronically reported “meaningful use” quality measures. This study is relevant to current policy as it uses quality metrics constructed by contemporary certified EHR technology, and quantitative EHR use metrics rather than self-reported use. Conclusion In the early stages of the “meaningful use” program, use of specific EHR functions was associated with higher performance on healthcare process metrics.


2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER NOTTE ◽  
NEIL SKOLNIK

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e000853
Author(s):  
Michael Topmiller ◽  
Jessica McCann ◽  
Jennifer Rankin ◽  
Hank Hoang ◽  
Joshua Bolton ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis paper explores the impact of service area-level social deprivation on health centre clinical quality measures.DesignCross-sectional data analysis of Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centres. We created a weighted service area social deprivation score for HRSA-funded health centres as a proxy measure for social determinants of health, and then explored adjusted and unadjusted clinical quality measures by weighted service area Social Deprivation Index quartiles for health centres.SettingsHRSA-funded health centres in the USA.ParticipantsOur analysis included a subset of 1161 HRSA-funded health centres serving more than 22 million mostly low-income patients across the country.ResultsHigher levels of social deprivation are associated with statistically significant poorer outcomes for all clinical quality outcome measures (both unadjusted and adjusted), including rates of blood pressure control, uncontrolled diabetes and low birth weight. The adjusted and unadjusted results are mixed for clinical quality process measures as higher levels of social deprivation are associated with better quality for some measures including cervical cancer screening and child immunisation status but worse quality for other such as colorectal cancer screening and early entry into prenatal care.ConclusionsThis research highlights the importance of incorporating community characteristics when evaluating clinical outcomes. We also present an innovative method for capturing health centre service area-level social deprivation and exploring its relationship to health centre clinical quality measures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Christiane T. LaBonte ◽  
Perry Payne ◽  
William Rollow ◽  
Mark W. Smith ◽  
Abdul Nissar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephen D. Persell ◽  
Tiffany Brown ◽  
Jason N. Doctor ◽  
Craig R. Fox ◽  
Noah J. Goldstein ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. e198569
Author(s):  
Kyle E. Knierim ◽  
Tristen L. Hall ◽  
L. Miriam Dickinson ◽  
Donald E. Nease ◽  
Dionisia R. de la Cerda ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 620-625
Author(s):  
Michael L. Parchman ◽  
Melissa L. Anderson ◽  
Robert B. Penfold ◽  
Elena Kuo ◽  
David A. Dorr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document