Introduction

Author(s):  
Pamela Ballinger

This introductory chapter provides an overview of Italian decolonization and refugeedom. Throughout the nearly two decades in which Italian decolonization unfolded, Italian authorities uniformly insisted that Italy could barely absorb its own citizen refugees, let alone those coming from other states. Italian authorities and international actors spent over a decade and a half debating the identity and refugee status of migrants from former Italian lands in Africa and the Balkans. Indeed, these individuals stimulated extensive debate over what it meant to be Italian, to be a refugee, and what sort of Italy would house these national refugees. Using the experiences of Italians repatriated “home” in the wake of decolonization, this book traces both the genesis of the postwar international refugee regime and the consequences of one of its key omissions: the ineligibility from international refugee status and protection of those migrants scholars have labeled “national refugees” or, in contemporary parlance, internally displaced persons.

Author(s):  
Bielefeldt Heiner, Prof ◽  
Ghanea Nazila, Dr ◽  
Wiener Michael, Dr

Though it is clear that refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons (IDPs) have an equal right to freedom of religion or belief, this right is often compromised in practice. This chapter examines a number of these challenges for freedom of religion or belief at various stages of the process by which persons become forcibly displaced, seek asylum and refugee status in another State, are able to or are denied the freedom to practise religion or belief in refugee camps, or face refoulement.


Author(s):  
Pamela Ballinger

This book explores Italy's remaking in light of the loss of a wide range of territorial possessions—colonies, protectorates, and provinces—in Africa and the Balkans, the repatriation of Italian nationals from those territories, and the integration of these “national refugees” into a country devastated by war and overwhelmed by foreign displaced persons from Eastern Europe. Post-World War II Italy served as an important laboratory, in which categories differentiating foreign refugees (who had crossed national boundaries) from national refugees (those who presumably did not) were debated, refined, and consolidated. Such distinctions resonated far beyond that particular historical moment, informing legal frameworks that remain in place today. Offering an alternative genealogy of the postwar international refugee regime, the book focuses on the consequences of one of its key omissions: the ineligibility from international refugee status of those migrants who became classified as national refugees. The presence of displaced persons also posed the complex question of who belonged, culturally and legally, in an Italy that was territorially and politically reconfigured by decolonization. The process of demarcating types of refugees thus represented a critical moment for Italy, one that endorsed an ethnic conception of identity that citizenship laws made explicit. Such an understanding of identity remains salient, as Italians still invoke language and race as bases of belonging in the face of mass immigration and ongoing refugee emergencies. The book's analysis of the postwar international refugee regime and Italian decolonization illuminates the study of human rights history, humanitarianism, postwar reconstruction, fascism and its aftermaths, and modern Italian history.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zelde Espinel ◽  
James Shultz ◽  
Anna Ordonez ◽  
Yuval Neria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-44
Author(s):  
N. O. Maruta ◽  
◽  
I. O. Yavdak ◽  
S. P. Koliadko ◽  
V. Yu. Fedchenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document