scholarly journals Multifaceted interventions to decrease mortality in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock—a quality improvement project

PeerJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany Siontis ◽  
Jennifer Elmer ◽  
Richard Dannielson ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
John Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Early Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Improve Compliance ◽  
Multifaceted Interventions ◽  
Physician Order Entry ◽  
Order Set

Despite knowledge that EGDT improves outcomes in septic patients, staff education on EGDT and compliance with the CPOE order set has been variable. Based on results of a resident survey to identify barriers to decrease severe sepsis/septic shock mortality in the medical intensive care unit (MICU), multifaceted interventions such as educational interventions to improve awareness to the importance of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), and the use of the Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) order set, were implemented in July 2013. CPOE order set was established to improve compliance with the EGDT resuscitation bundle elements. Orders were reviewed and compared for patients admitted to the MICU with severe sepsis/septic shock in July and August 2013 (controls) and 2014 (following the intervention). Similarly, educational slide sets were used as interventions for residents before the start of their ICU rotations in July and August 2013. While CPOE order set compliance did not significantly improve (78% vs. 76%,p= 0.74), overall EGDT adherence improved from 43% to 68% (p= 0.0295). Although there was a trend toward improved mortality, this did not reach statistical significance. This study shows that education interventions can be used to increase awareness of severe sepsis/septic shock and improve overall EGDT adherence.

Effect of fluid bolus triggers and their combination on fluid responsiveness in optimization phase of severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation

MedPharmRes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Bien Le ◽  
Dai Huynh ◽  
Mai Tuan ◽  
Minh Phan ◽  
Thao Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Fluid Bolus ◽  
Low Blood Pressure ◽  
Low Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Objectives: to evaluate the fluid responsiveness according to fluid bolus triggers and their combination in severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: observational study. Patients and Methods: patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who already received fluid after rescue phase of resuscitation. Fluid bolus (FB) was prescribed upon perceived hypovolemic manifestations: low central venous pressure (CVP), low blood pressure, tachycardia, low urine output (UOP), hyperlactatemia. FB was performed by Ringer lactate 500 ml/30 min and responsiveness was defined by increasing in stroke volume (SV) ≥15%. Results: 84 patients were enrolled, among them 30 responded to FB (35.7%). Demographic and hemodynamic profile before fluid bolus were similar between responders and non-responders, except CVP was lower in responders (7.3 ± 3.4 mmHg vs 9.2 ± 3.6 mmHg) (p 0.018). Fluid response in low CVP, low blood pressure, tachycardia, low UOP, hyperlactatemia were 48.6%, 47.4%, 38.5%, 37.0%, 36.8% making the odd ratio (OR) of these triggers were 2.81 (1.09-7.27), 1.60 (0.54-4.78), 1.89 (0.58-6.18), 1.15 (0.41-3.27) and 1.27 (0.46-3.53) respectively. Although CVP < 8 mmHg had a higher response rate, the association was not consistent at lower cut-offs. The combination of these triggers appeared to raise fluid response but did not reach statistical significance: 26.7% (1 trigger), 31.0% (2 triggers), 35.7% (3 triggers), 55.6% (4 triggers), 100% (5 triggers). Conclusions: fluid responsiveness was low in optimization phase of resuscitation. No fluid bolus trigger was superior to the others in term of providing a higher responsiveness, their combination did not improve fluid responsiveness as well.

Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Revisited

CHEST Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1579-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny M. Otero ◽  
H. Bryant Nguyen ◽  
David T. Huang ◽  
David F. Gaieski ◽  
Munish Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Early Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

2018 ◽  
pp. 104-108
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Early Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

This case focuses on detecting sepsis through early goal-directed therapies by asking the question: Does aggressive correction of hemodynamic disturbances in the early stages of sepsis improve outcomes? Early goal-directed therapies are aimed at restoring a balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen demand. Patients included in the study were adults presenting to the emergency room with severe sepsis or septic shock. Study results indicated that most patients with severe sepsis or septic shock should be managed with aggressive hemodynamic monitoring and support immediately on presentation in the emergency department (or, if this is not possible, in the intensive care unit) for 6 hours or until there is resolution of hemodynamic disturbances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document