BACKGROUND: The preferred treatment method for acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is surgical intervention.
AIM: We aimed to show that, regardless of the good results of surgical treatment, conventional delayed treatment might be very useful in some situations and might lead to chronicity of hematoma as well as reduction of surgical intervention scope and reduce risk of anesthesia. It might also give rise to spontaneous resorption of hematoma.
METHODS: In the period March 1, 2013–March 1, 2020, we retrospectively examined 215 aSDH patients. The basic result of the outcome analysis was evaluated on the basis of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge after 3-month and 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 215 patients with aSDH and minor or moderate brain injury were examined, while applying conventional delayed treatment, the following results were obtained: large craniotomy was carried out in 123 patients (57.2%) on the 2nd–3rd day of observation, small craniotomy with drainage was applied in 29 patients (13.5%) and spontaneous resorption of subdural hematoma occurred in 63 patients (29.3%). The median score as per the Glasgow Coma Scale at admission to the hospital was 11.4.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that conventional delayed treatment applied in patients with aSDH and minor or moderate craniocerebral injury might lead to chronicity and resorption of aSDH. The outcomes as per the GOS scale also showed good data three and 6 months after hospitalization.
Delayed Surgical Intervention in Acute Subdural Hematoma
