scholarly journals Quantitative Readability Assessment of the Internal Medicine Online Patient Information on Annals.org

Cureus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A Abu-Heija ◽  
Maya Shatta ◽  
Mustafa Ajam ◽  
Usama Abu-Heija ◽  
Nashat Imran ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 287e-295e ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil K. Seth ◽  
Christina R. Vargas ◽  
Danielle J. Chuang ◽  
Bernard T. Lee

Thyroid ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Edmunds ◽  
Alastair K. Denniston ◽  
Kristien Boelaert ◽  
Jayne A. Franklyn ◽  
Omar M. Durrani

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir A. Ballestas ◽  
Roberto M. Soriano ◽  
Anita B. Sethna

2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
pp. 1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Edmunds ◽  
Robert J. Barry ◽  
Alastair K. Denniston

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e000971
Author(s):  
Bart J Laan ◽  
Willemijn B Huiszoon ◽  
Frits Holleman ◽  
Marja A Boermeester ◽  
Karin A H Kaasjager ◽  
...  

BackgroundChoosing Wisely aims to reduce low-value care to improve quality and lower costs. In the Netherlands, this campaign offers three recommendations for internal medicine applicable in emergency departments (EDs): (1) do not place an indwelling urinary catheter in non-critically ill patients who can void; (2) do not order plain abdominal radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain; and (3) discuss whether treatment limitations are needed. This quality improvement project aims to increase the implementation of the recommendations by patient information leaflets.MethodsIn a prospective before–after study, we collected data every other week during baseline and intervention periods (both 7 months) in two university medical centres. The primary outcomes were the adherence rates to the recommendations.Results805 patients visited the EDs for internal medicine, of whom 391 (48.6%) were hospitalised. Only 153 (19%) patients received the information leaflet. We found no change in implementation rates of the recommendations after the introduction of the patient information leaflet. In the baseline period, 28 patients received a urinary catheter, of whom 5 (17.9%) had no appropriate indication, compared with 4 (25.0%) of 16 patients in the intervention period (p=0.572). Unnecessary abdominal X-ray occurred once in the baseline period and not in the intervention period. Treatment limitations were not reported in 13 (6.5%) of 200 hospitalised patients in the baseline period, and in 17 (8.9%) of 191 patients in the intervention period (p=0.373).ConclusionsPatient information leaflets did not increase the implementation of Choosing Wisely recommendations, which can be due to a high baseline rate and a poor dissemination of leaflets. Our ED seems not to be a practicable setting for dissemination of leaflets, since staff engagement was not possible due to high workload and shortage of qualified nursing staff in the Netherlands.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document