I-pure Submodules, I-FP-injective Modules and I-flat Modules

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-188
Author(s):  
Zhanmin Zhu
Author(s):  
Wenjing Chen ◽  
Zhongkui Liu

In this paper, we construct some model structures corresponding Gorenstein [Formula: see text]-modules and relative Gorenstein flat modules associated to duality pairs, Frobenius pairs and cotorsion pairs. By investigating homological properties of Gorenstein [Formula: see text]-modules and some known complete hereditary cotorsion pairs, we describe several types of complexes and obtain some characterizations of Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings. Based on some facts given in this paper, we find new duality pairs and show that [Formula: see text] is covering as well as enveloping and [Formula: see text] is preenveloping under certain conditions, where [Formula: see text] denotes the class of Gorenstein [Formula: see text]-injective modules and [Formula: see text] denotes the class of Gorenstein [Formula: see text]-flat modules. We give some recollements via projective cotorsion pair [Formula: see text] cogenerated by a set, where [Formula: see text] denotes the class of Gorenstein [Formula: see text]-projective modules. Also, many recollements are immediately displayed through setting specific complete duality pairs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 2050050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjiong Yang ◽  
Xiaoguang Yan

In this paper, we study the conditions under which a module is a strict Mittag–Leffler module over the class [Formula: see text] of Gorenstein injective modules. To this aim, we introduce the notion of [Formula: see text]-projective modules and prove that over noetherian rings, if a module can be expressed as the direct limit of finitely presented [Formula: see text]-projective modules, then it is a strict Mittag–Leffler module over [Formula: see text]. As applications, we prove that if [Formula: see text] is a two-sided noetherian ring, then [Formula: see text] is a covering class closed under pure submodules if and only if every injective module is strict Mittag–Leffler over [Formula: see text].


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Javad Nikmehr ◽  
Farzad Shaveisi

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Bo ◽  
Liu Zhongkui

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 575-586
Author(s):  
Sergio Estrada ◽  
Alina Iacob ◽  
Holly Zolt

For a given class of modules [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text] be the class of exact complexes having all cycles in [Formula: see text], and dw([Formula: see text]) the class of complexes with all components in [Formula: see text]. Denote by [Formula: see text][Formula: see text] the class of Gorenstein injective R-modules. We prove that the following are equivalent over any ring R: every exact complex of injective modules is totally acyclic; every exact complex of Gorenstein injective modules is in [Formula: see text]; every complex in dw([Formula: see text][Formula: see text]) is dg-Gorenstein injective. The analogous result for complexes of flat and Gorenstein flat modules also holds over arbitrary rings. If the ring is n-perfect for some integer n ≥ 0, the three equivalent statements for flat and Gorenstein flat modules are equivalent with their counterparts for projective and projectively coresolved Gorenstein flat modules. We also prove the following characterization of Gorenstein rings. Let R be a commutative coherent ring; then the following are equivalent: (1) every exact complex of FP-injective modules has all its cycles Ding injective modules; (2) every exact complex of flat modules is F-totally acyclic, and every R-module M such that M+ is Gorenstein flat is Ding injective; (3) every exact complex of injectives has all its cycles Ding injective modules and every R-module M such that M+ is Gorenstein flat is Ding injective. If R has finite Krull dimension, statements (1)–(3) are equivalent to (4) R is a Gorenstein ring (in the sense of Iwanaga).


Author(s):  
Wei Qi ◽  
Xiaolei Zhang

Let [Formula: see text] be a commutative ring. If the nilpotent radical [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a divided prime ideal, then [Formula: see text] is called a [Formula: see text]-ring. In this paper, we first distinguish the classes of nonnil-coherent rings and [Formula: see text]-coherent rings introduced by Bacem and Ali [Nonnil-coherent rings, Beitr. Algebra Geom. 57(2) (2016) 297–305], and then characterize nonnil-coherent rings in terms of [Formula: see text]-flat modules, nonnil-injective modules and nonnil-FP-injective modules. A [Formula: see text]-ring [Formula: see text] is called a [Formula: see text]-IF ring if any nonnil-injective module is [Formula: see text]-flat. We obtain some module-theoretic characterizations of [Formula: see text]-IF rings. Two examples are given to distinguish [Formula: see text]-IF rings and IF [Formula: see text]-rings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document