cyanocitta cristata
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Behaviour ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Sharp ◽  
Kamal Islam

Abstract Many studies have shown that nest predators affect their prey indirectly by inducing changes in the behaviour of the prey. Studies suggest that the type and degree of nest defence strategies depends heavily on species, along with nest type and location. One such strategy, nest vigilance, allows individuals to collect information and make informed decisions based on their surroundings. In this study, we simulated the intrusion of a common avian nest predator (blue jay, Cyanocitta cristata) into the territory of nesting cerulean warblers (Setophaga cerulea) and evaluated eight different behavioural variables to determine their response to the nest predator. Female cerulean warblers were more vigilant on their nest when exposed to a potential predator compared to a nest with lower threat of predation. Females exposed to a nest predator increased incubation bout by 109% and brooding bout by 60%. Our data also suggest that male cerulean warblers reduce their provisioning rate during the early nestling stage (−1 feeding/hour) and late nestling stage (−3 feedings/hour), although more data are needed. Modification of incubation bout length and nestling provisioning rate are common strategies employed by songbirds to reduce activity around the nest, by decreasing detection opportunities of visually-oriented nest predators. Currently, the only understanding we have on how cerulean warblers respond to a nest predator is based on observational data. The results of this study provide the first evidence that cerulean warblers are able to identify species that pose a threat to the safety of their nest, and that they modify their behaviour to reduce nest detection by predators. The results of this study provide a better understanding of a relatively unknown aspect of the breeding behaviour of this species. This study is also first to describe how an open-cup, canopy-nesting species responds to an increase in nest predation threat.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly G. Smith ◽  
Keith A. Tarvin ◽  
Glen E. Woolfenden
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga F. Lazareva ◽  
Kristy Gould ◽  
Jamie Linert ◽  
Damien Caillaud ◽  
Regina Paxton Gazes

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremie Bouffard ◽  
Dany Garant ◽  
Patrick Bergeron

Predation is a leading cause of nest failure in birds, which has significant consequences on their population dynamics. Rodents commonly prey on nests in deciduous forest habitats. This has important implications considering how rodent populations fluctuate with changes in resource availability, such as synchronized but intermittent tree-seed production (mast). In this study, we investigated ground-nest egg predation by rodents over 2 years characterized by high and low beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) seed availability (mast vs. no-mast years). We used artificial nests monitored by motion-sensing cameras on a study site where eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus (Linnaeus, 1758)) local abundance was known. We placed the artificial nests in areas of high and low chipmunk abundance as proxy of predation risk. Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata (Linnaeus, 1758)) depredated the most eggs overall, but rodent population and egg depredation increased in 2018 following the 2017 mast. However, chipmunks were minor predators and their local abundance did not reflect predation risk. Our results highlight the complexity of predation dynamics on ground-nesting birds and the importance of studying them locally and over multiple years.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Dahl ◽  
Gary Ritchison

Some species of birds use their vocalisations to communicate predator presence and the level of threat they pose, including two species of corvids (Corvidae), American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and Siberian Jays (Perisoreus infaustus). Our objective was to determine if Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata), another corvid, also use specific calls or vary the characteristics of certain calls to convey information about the level of threat posed by aerial predators. During the non-breeding seasons of 2014 and 2015, we recorded and analysed the vocal responses of Blue Jays to study skins of six species of raptors that varied in size and the level of threat they pose to Blue Jays. Experiments were conducted at seven locations in Madison County, Kentucky. The mean number of Blue Jays present during trials was 2.6, and Blue Jays uttered five different vocalisations during trials, with ditonal and monotonal jeers given most frequently. The rate at which Blue Jays uttered ditonal jeers differed among trials, with rates highest during trials with an Eastern Screech-Owl (Megascops asio) and a Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus). However, the characteristics of ditonal and monotonal jeers (duration, low frequency, high frequency, and peak frequency) did not differ among trials. These results suggest that Blue Jays may either perceive Eastern Screech-Owls and Sharp-shinned Hawks as the greatest threats or, alternatively, as potential, but less threatening predators, and, therefore, they were willing to take greater risks when mobbing them. In contrast, Blue Jays mobbed the other raptors, i.e. American Kestrels (Falco sparverius), Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), and Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus), with much less intensity, likely because they posed less of a threat or, in the case of Cooper's Hawks (Accipiter cooperii) that are known predators of Blue Jays, perhaps because mobbing with greater intensity, e.g. approaching more closely, posed too great a risk. Blue Jays in our study used the same calls with the same characteristics when responding to potential predators, only calling rates differed. However, such variation in calling rates when mobbing would likely provide useful information about the presence of, and possibly the threat posed by, potential predators for conspecifics and, perhaps, heterospecifics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document