male pheromone
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

91
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Córdova-García ◽  
Laura Sirot ◽  
Solana Abraham ◽  
Francisco Díaz-Fleischer ◽  
Norma Flores-Estevez ◽  
...  

Copulation and/or ejaculate components can alter female physiological state and female post-mating behavior. The objective of the present study was to determine if copulation and male reproductive accessory gland products (MAGs) modify the behavior of female Anastrepha ludens (Loew) and Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart; Diptera: Tephritidae) in response to two stimuli: male-emitted pheromone and oviposition host volatiles. Olfactometry studies revealed that mated females of both A. ludens and A. obliqua have a stronger response for host volatiles compared to unmated females, which have a stronger response for male pheromone. We also examined olfactory responses of females mated to testectomized males who could transfer MAGs but not sperm. In both species, MAGs alone did not cause the change in the olfactory response observed after copulation, unlike what has been found in Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). Females mated to testectomized males responded equally to the male sex pheromone or to host volatiles, thus suggesting that the whole ejaculate is needed to elicit the complete behavioral switch in olfactory response. The function of MAGs is still unknown in these two pests of economic importance. The response for host volatiles by mated females has implications for the development of baits and traps that should preferably attract and target this population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 104210
Author(s):  
Eric C. Yip ◽  
István Mikó ◽  
Jonah M. Ulmer ◽  
Nancy A. Cherim ◽  
Mark A. Townley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 401-415
Author(s):  
Michael P. Shahandeh ◽  
Alison Pischedda ◽  
Jason M. Rodriguez ◽  
Thomas L. Turner

Species of flies in the genus Drosophila differ dramatically in their preferences for mates, but little is known about the genetic or neurological underpinnings of this evolution. Recent advances have been made to our understanding of one case: pheromone preference evolution between the species D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Males of both species are very sensitive to the pheromone 7,11-HD that is present only on the cuticle of female D. melanogaster. In one species this cue activates courtship, and in the other it represses it. This change in valence was recently shown to result from the modification of central processing neurons, rather than changes in peripherally expressed receptors, but nothing is known about the genetic changes that are responsible. In the current study, we show that a 1.35 Mb locus on the X chromosome has a major effect on male 7,11-HD preference. Unfortunately, when this locus is divided, the effect is largely lost. We instead attempt to filter the 159 genes within this region using our newfound understanding of the neuronal underpinnings of this phenotype to identify and test candidate genes. We present the results of these tests, and discuss the difficulty of identifying the genetic architecture of behavioral traits and the potential of connecting these genetic changes to the neuronal modifications that elicit different behaviors.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Shahandeh ◽  
Alison Pischedda ◽  
Jason M. Rodriguez ◽  
Thomas L. Turner

AbstractSpecies of flies in the genus Drosophila differ dramatically in their preferences for mates, but little is known about the genetic or neurological underpinnings of this evolution. Recent advances have been made to our understanding of one case: pheromone preference evolution between the species D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Males of both species are very sensitive to the pheromone 7,11-HD that is present only on the cuticle of female D. melanogaster. In one species this cue activates courtship, and in the other it represses it. This change in valence was recently shown to result from the modification of central processing neurons, rather than changes in peripherally expressed receptors, but nothing is known about the genetic changes that are responsible. In the current study, we show that a 1.35 Mb locus on the X chromosome has a major effect on male 7,11-HD preference. Unfortunately, when this locus is divided, the effect is largely lost. We instead attempt to filter the 159 genes within this region using our newfound understanding of the neuronal underpinnings of this phenotype to identify and test candidate genes. We present the results of these tests, and discuss the difficulty of identifying the genetic architecture of behavioral traits and the potential of connecting these genetic changes to the neuronal modifications that elicit different behaviors.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Park ◽  
Tracy Tran ◽  
Elizabeth Scheuermann ◽  
Linda Gutierrez ◽  
Christopher Stojanik ◽  
...  

AbstractAlcohol-induced aggression is a destructive and widespread phenomenon, but we understand very little about the mechanisms that produce this behavior. We found that two different alcohol exposures potentiate aggression in male flies. (1) A pharmacologically relevant dose of alcohol increases aggression and decreases a goal-directed behavior in male flies. (2) In addition, the odor of alcohol itself enhances intermale aggression by potentiating olfactory signaling by cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVa), a volatile male pheromone. Characterizing these behaviors in the genetically tractable fruit fly can lead to a better understanding of the molecular correlates that regulate alcohol-induced aggression in humans and provide insights into an ethologically relevant behavior.One Sentence SummaryWe identified two pathways through which alcohol stimulates intermale aggression in flies; one acts by potentiating a male olfactory pheromone while the other is mediated by the systemic effects of alcohol.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Darragh ◽  
Kelsey J. R. P. Byers ◽  
Richard M. Merrill ◽  
W. Owen McMillan ◽  
Stefan Schulz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-466
Author(s):  
J. Stanley ◽  
S. Chandrasekaran ◽  
G. Preetha ◽  
K. Subaharan

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-623
Author(s):  
I. M. Sakhautdinov ◽  
A. M. Gumerov ◽  
A. F. Mukhamet’yanova ◽  
A. B. Atangulov ◽  
M. S. Yunusov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document