Assessment of the ages-at-death and the probable sexes of the Sunghir humans provides a baseline for their paleobiological evaluation. The former is particularly important for the comparative analysis of the immature Sunghir 2 and 3 skeletons, given the marked changes in size and shape with development. The latter is more important for the adult Sunghir 1, 5, and 6 remains, given some degree of sexual dimorphism among recent humans and apparently within Late Pleistocene early modern humans. In the assessment of age-at-death, it is necessary to evaluate the remains with reference to chronological scales derived from extant human populations of known age (or very recent historical skeletal samples with documented ages). This consideration applies particularly to changes in fibrocartilaginous articulations with age (in this case, a sternal rib end and an auricular surface of Sunghir 1) and to dental calcification during development (for Sunghir 2 and 3). The majority of the data available for these approaches derives from recent European and European-derived (primarily North American) populations, with occasional cross-references to more limited data on recent populations from elsewhere in the Old World. The one exception to this requirement is dental occlusal attrition, for which very general Late Pleistocene (and preindustrial Holocene) reference samples are appropriate, in all cases using scales that are based either on other methods of skeletal aging or employ some version of the “Miles technique” (sequential assessment of dental wear for postcanine teeth as they come into functional occlusion; Brothwell 1981). The determination of sex is most reliable when it utilizes the pelvis, and there is a series of criteria for pelvic sexual evaluation that appear to be universal among recent humans (Brůžek 2002). These dimorphic features mostly appear during adolescence associated with differential lateral development of the pelvis (Coleman 1969; Lavelle 1995). Dimorphic aspects of the greater sciatic notch may appear prior to puberty (Holcomb and Konigsberg 1995; Scheuer and Black 2000), but tests sexing recent human immature skeletons of known sex have provided poor results and tend to identify males more accurately than females (Cardoso and Saunders 2008; Vlak et al. 2008; Wilson et al. 2008).