nuclear medicine physician
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
MariaMathew DSouza ◽  
Rajnish Sharma ◽  
Abhinav Jaimini


Author(s):  
Behnoosh Teimourian Fard ◽  
Kiarash Amirmozaffari Sabet ◽  
Mohammadreza Ay

Purpose: Cardiac SPECT imaging is widely used for many clinical practices such as the diagnostic of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI). In this work, we introduced the ProSPECT system, a dedicated cardiac SPECT system with open-gantry design. Materials and Methods: In this study we assessed the performance of the system based on NEMA-NU1-2007 standards. The ProSPECT system was characterized by measurement of planar, tomographic and clinical parameters. Results: Planar measurements showed 7.6 mm and 8.9% of spatial resolution and energy resolution at 140 keV, respectively. The tomographic resolution at 250 mm radius of rotation was 12.3 mm. Also, the maximum LOR and COR error for the tomographic imaging are obtained 1.1 mm and 1.8 mm, respectively. The clinical images that obtained using the system were confirmed by nuclear medicine physician expert. Conclusion: It concluded that the ProSPECT imaging is qualified for cardiac SPECT imaging.



2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Declan G. Murphy ◽  
Michael S. Hofman ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
John Violet ◽  
Rodney J. Hicks ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Komarraju ◽  
Twyla B. Bartel ◽  
Lisa A. Dickinson ◽  
Frederick D. Grant ◽  
Tracy L. Yarbrough


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (S1) ◽  
pp. 41-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lheureux ◽  
C. Denoyelle ◽  
P. S. Ohashi ◽  
J. S. De Bono ◽  
F. M. Mottaghy


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9616-9616
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S Dylke ◽  
Geoff P Schembri ◽  
Deborah Black ◽  
Leigh C. Ward ◽  
Dale L Bailey ◽  
...  

9616 Background: Diagnosis of upper limb lymphedema (LE) secondary to treatment for cancer has been complicated by the range of diagnostic thresholds used. Traditional thresholds were arbitrarily chosen but recently normative-based cut-offs have been established. However, the diagnostic power of these thresholds has not been compared to changes identified with lymphoscintigraphy, the gold standard for diagnosis of LE. The aim of this study was to determine thresholds for commonly used clinical diagnostic tools based on lymphatic imaging outcomes. Methods: Women previously diagnosed with LE secondary to treatment for cancer (n=67), and women without LE (n=20) participated. Lymphoscintigraphy was completed and the presence and severity of dermal back flow qualitatively scored as none to mild or moderate to severe by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. On the same day, circumference measurements and segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) for 10 cm intervals from the ulnar styloid to 40 cm proximal were recorded. The BIS inter-limb ratio for each segment and the inter-limb circumference differences were compared to diagnostic thresholds based on 2 and 3 standard deviations (SD) above the mean from normative data. Results: The number of BIS segments and circumferences measurements above a 3SD threshold correlated significantly with the dermal backflow score (Rs= 0.710 and 0.824 respectively).The number of abnormal BIS segments detected did not differ significantly between a 2SD and 3SD threshold (χ2=0.23 p=0.63). Of the 20 new abnormal segments detected, 7 were from participants with no or mild evidence of dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy including 3 from control participants. In contrast, 46 new abnormal inter-limb circumference differences, all from those with a LE diagnosis, were detected using a 2SD threshold (χ2= 31.785, p<0.001) Conclusions: The need for a standardized, evidenced-based approach for identification of LE is essential. We recommend diagnostic thresholds for segmental BIS be set at 3SD above the mean to minimize false positive diagnoses whereas a lower threshold of 2SD is necessary for the less sensitive inter-limb circumference difference measurements.



2012 ◽  
pp. 143-156
Author(s):  
Thomas N. B. Pascual ◽  
Jerry M. Obaldo ◽  
Teofilo O. L. San Luis ◽  
Marcela J. Leus


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document