unitary similarity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke T Slater ◽  
John A Williams ◽  
Andreas Karwath ◽  
Hilary Fanning ◽  
Simon Ball ◽  
...  

Identification of ontology concepts in clinical narrative text enables the creation of phenotype profiles that can be associated with clinical entities, such as patients or drugs. Constructing patient phenotype profiles using formal ontologies enables their analysis via semantic similarity, in turn enabling the use of background knowledge in clustering or classification analyses. However, traditional semantic similarity approaches collapse complex relationships between patient phenotypes into a unitary similarity scores for each pair of patients. Moreover, single scores may be based only on matching terms with the greatest information content (IC), ignoring other dimensions of patient similarity. This process necessarily leads to a loss of information in the resulting representation of patient similarity, and is especially apparent when using very large text-derived and highly multi-morbid phenotype profiles. Moreover, it renders finding a biological explanation for similarity very difficult; the black box problem. In this article, we explore the generation of multiple semantic similarity scores for patients based on different facets of their phenotypic manifestation, which we define through different sub-graphs in the Human Phenotype Ontology. We further present a new methodology for deriving sets of qualitative class descriptions for groups of entities described by ontology terms. Leveraging this strategy to obtain meaningful explanations for our semantic clusters alongside other evaluation techniques, we show that semantic clustering with ontology-derived facets enables the representation, and thus identification of, clinically relevant phenotype relationships not easily recoverable using overall clustering alone. In this way, we demonstrate the potential of faceted semantic clustering for gaining a deeper and more nuanced understanding of text-derived patient phenotypes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 211-246
Author(s):  
Peter Lancaster ◽  
Ion Zaballa

Many physical problems require the spectral analysis of quadratic matrix polynomials $M\lambda^2+D\lambda +K$, $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$, with $n \times n$ Hermitian matrix coefficients, $M,\;D,\;K$. In this largely expository paper, we present and discuss canonical forms for these polynomials under the action of both congruence and similarity transformations of a linearization and also $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity transformations of the polynomial itself. Canonical structures for these processes are clarified, with no restrictions on eigenvalue multiplicities. Thus, we bring together two lines of attack: (a) analytic via direct reduction of the $n \times n$ system itself by $\lambda$-dependent unitary similarity and (b) algebraic via reduction of $2n \times 2n$ symmetric linearizations of the system by either congruence (Section 4) or similarity (Sections 5 and 6) transformations which are independent of the parameter $\lambda$. Some new results are brought to light in the process. Complete descriptions of associated canonical structures (over $\mathbb{R}$ and over $\mathbb{C}$) are provided -- including the two cases of real symmetric coefficients and complex Hermitian coefficients. These canonical structures include the so-called sign characteristic. This notion appears in the literature with different meanings depending on the choice of canonical form. These sign characteristics are studied here and connections between them are clarified. In particular, we consider which of the linearizations reproduce the (intrinsic) signs associated with the analytic (Rellich) theory (Sections 7 and 9).


Author(s):  
Howard E. Haber

In addition to the diagonalization of a normal matrix by a unitary similarity transformation, there are two other types of diagonalization procedures that sometimes arise in quantum theory applications — the singular value decomposition and the Autonne–Takagi factorization. In this pedagogical review, each of these diagonalization procedures is performed for the most general [Formula: see text] matrices for which the corresponding diagonalization is possible, and explicit analytical results are provided in each of the three cases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-186
Author(s):  
Elias Wegert ◽  
Ilya Spitkovsky

Abstract In their LAMA 2016 paper Gau, Wang and Wu conjectured that a partial isometry A acting on ℂ n cannot have a circular numerical range with a non-zero center, and proved this conjecture for n ≤ 4. We prove it for operators with rank A = n − 1 and any n. The proof is based on the unitary similarity of A to a compressed shift operator SB generated by a finite Blaschke product B. We then use the description of the numerical range of SB as intersection of Poncelet polygons, a special representation of Blaschke products related to boundary interpolation, and an explicit formula for the barycenter of the vertices of Poncelet polygons involving elliptic functions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 122-127
Author(s):  
A.M. Vetoshkin ◽  
◽  
A.A. Shum ◽  

In this paper, strictly oblique projectors are defined as projectors that cannot be represented as the sum of two projectors, one of which is a nonzero orthoprojector. A theorem is proved that each projector can be represented in a unique way as the sum of a strictly oblique projector and an orthoprojector. The properties of such projectors are given. For example: if the projector is strictly oblique, then its Hermitian adjoint is also strictly oblique; the rank of a strictly oblique projector is at most n/2, where n is the order of the projector matrix; the property of the projector to be strictly oblique is preserved with a unitary similarity. The work is a continuation of the previous work of the authors, the main result of which is such a matrix expression for an arbitrary projector: where A and B are two matrices of full rank whose columns define range and the null space of this projector. Based on this result, the article shows that the strictly oblique part of any projector P is given by the expression: P(P – P+P)+P. And equality P = P(P – P+P)+P is a criterion that the projector P is a strictly oblique projector. The decomposition of the projector obtained in the work is applied to the practical problem of oblique projection onto the plane


2020 ◽  
Vol 591 ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Aivan Afable ◽  
Ralph John de la Cruz ◽  
Agnes T. Paras ◽  
Mary Elizabeth Segui

2018 ◽  
Vol 542 ◽  
pp. 484-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bendaoud ◽  
A. Benyouness ◽  
M. Sarih ◽  
S. Sekkat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document