mercuric iodide
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

561
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

31
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 2551-2568
Author(s):  
Gabor Vali

Abstract. Pre-activation of freezing nucleation (PFN) with mercuric iodide was first reported by Edwards, Evans, and Zipper (Edwards et al., 1970). They found that freezing, followed by melting just a few degrees Celsius above the melting point, leads to subsequent freezing of the sample more than 10 ∘C above the temperature of the initial nucleation temperature. Results presented in this paper are from laboratory experiments that followed the procedure designed by Edwards, Evans, and Zipper (1970) but employed multiple sample drops and many repetitions of the pre-activation cycle. The results obtained confirm the basic findings of the earlier work and refine them. It is shown that the pre-activation effect is lost gradually as the sample is heated above the melting point and that some effect is still seen with heating above +5 ∘C. Instrumental limitation in these experiments precluded detection of pre-activated freezing above −2 ∘C, but that possibility is not excluded. Some PFN was noted down to at least −6 ∘C. By also drawing on the results of Seeley and Seidler (2001), PFN is analyzed in search of constraints that help define the process responsible for it. No firm conclusions are reached, but the accumulated evidence points quite clearly to the role of surface sites in leading to PFN. Thus, sites are seen to play the same role as they do in heterogeneous freezing nucleation in general. PFN differs from pore condensation and freezing described by Marcolli (2020) and David et al. (2020), in that PFN is observed in liquid water while that process takes place in the vapor phase. Further explorations of the process leading to PFN can help in understanding ice nucleation and its practical manifestations at a basic level. The results call attention to an ice nucleation pathway hitherto barely explored that can be expected to have consequences in how ice nucleation occurs in atmospheric clouds and in other systems. PFN is also a potential tool for deliberate initiation of freezing in clouds and other systems.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabor Vali

Abstract. Pre-activation of freezing nucleation was examined in laboratory experiments with mercuric iodide suspensions in water. The experiments followed the procedure designed by Edwards, Evans and Zipper (1970) but employed multiple sample drops and many repetitions of the pre-activation cycle. The results obtained confirm the basic findings of the earlier work and refine it. By also drawing on the results of Seeley and Seidler (2001), pre-activated freezing nucleation (PFN in this work) is analyzed in search of constraints that help define the process responsible for it. No firm conclusions are reached, but evidence is accumulated pointing to the role of definite structures being involved in PFN, similar to the role of sites in heterogeneous freezing nucleation in general. PFN differs from pore condensation and freezing described by Marcolli (2020) and David et al. (2020) in that it takes place in liquid water. Further exploration of this process can help understading ice nucleation at the basic level and in its practical manifestations. The results call attention to an ice nucleation pathway hitherto barely explored and which can be expected to have consequences in how ice nucleation occurs in atmospheric clouds and in other systems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 484-489
Author(s):  
Kum-Bae Kim ◽  
Jin-Seon Kim ◽  
Kyo-Tae Kim ◽  
Sang-Hyoun Choi ◽  
Gyu-Seok Cho ◽  
...  

Vacuum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Qi Jin ◽  
Lu Huang ◽  
Xingyu Cui ◽  
Qingfei Meng ◽  
Weiguang Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document