barrier strategy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Engineering ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu He ◽  
Xinwang Liu ◽  
Pan Li ◽  
Panpan Wang ◽  
Haijun Cheng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 13448-13458
Author(s):  
Fuyun Sun ◽  
◽  
Yuelei Li ◽  

<abstract><p>In this study, we consider a periodic dividend barrier strategy in an improved thinning risk model, which indicates that insurance companies randomly receive premiums and pay dividends. In the improved model, the premium is stochastic, and the claim counting process is a p-thinning process of the premium counting process. The integral equations satisfied by the Gerber-Shiu function and the expected discounted cumulative dividend function are derived. Explicit expressions of those actuarial functions are obtained when the claim and premium sizes are exponentially distributed. We analyze and illustrate the impact of various parameters on them and obtain the optimal barrier. Finally, a conclusion is drawn.</p></abstract>


Risks ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Florin Avram ◽  
Dan Goreac ◽  
Jean-François Renaud

In this paper, we study a stochastic control problem faced by an insurance company allowed to pay out dividends and make capital injections. As in (Løkka and Zervos (2008); Lindensjö and Lindskog (2019)), for a Brownian motion risk process, and in Zhu and Yang (2016), for diffusion processes, we will show that the so-called Løkka–Zervos alternative also holds true in the case of a Cramér–Lundberg risk process with exponential claims. More specifically, we show that: if the cost of capital injections is low, then according to a double-barrier strategy, it is optimal to pay dividends and inject capital, meaning ruin never occurs; and if the cost of capital injections is high, then according to a single-barrier strategy, it is optimal to pay dividends and never inject capital, meaning ruin occurs at the first passage below zero.


Risks ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Renaud

We consider de Finetti’s stochastic control problem when the (controlled) process is allowed to spend time under the critical level. More precisely, we consider a generalized version of this control problem in a spectrally negative Lévy model with exponential Parisian ruin. We show that, under mild assumptions on the Lévy measure, an optimal strategy is formed by a barrier strategy and that this optimal barrier level is always less than the optimal barrier level when classical ruin is implemented. In addition, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the barrier strategy at level zero to be optimal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 351 ◽  
pp. 101-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Dong ◽  
Chuancun Yin ◽  
Hongshuai Dai
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wafa Al Shizawi ◽  
Aadil Al Nairi ◽  
Allan Cooper ◽  
Khalfan Al Mahrazy ◽  
Pristiwanto Putra

2018 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina P. Sendova ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Ruixi Zhang
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-337
Author(s):  
Huanqun Jiang

AbstractIn this paper, we extend the optimality of the barrier strategy for the dividend payment problem to the setting that the underlying surplus process is a spectrally negative Lévy process and the discounting factor is an exponential Lévy process. The proof of the main result uses the fluctuation identities of spectrally negative Lévy processes. This extends recent results of Eisenberg for the case where the accumulated interest rate and surplus process are independent Brownian motions with drift.


Risks ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Cheung ◽  
Haibo Liu ◽  
Jae-Kyung Woo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document