virtual knots
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

197
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 3459-3482
Author(s):  
Colin Adams ◽  
Or Eisenberg ◽  
Jonah Greenberg ◽  
Kabir Kapoor ◽  
Zhen Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Amrendra Gill ◽  
Maxim Ivanov ◽  
Madeti Prabhakar ◽  
Andrei Vesnin

F-polynomials for virtual knots were defined by Kaur, Prabhakar and Vesnin in 2018 using flat virtual knot invariants. These polynomials naturally generalize Kauffman’s affine index polynomial and use smoothing in the classical crossing of a virtual knot diagram. In this paper, we introduce weight functions for ordered orientable virtual and flat virtual links. A flat virtual link is an equivalence class of virtual links with respect to a local symmetry changing a type of classical crossing in a diagram. By considering three types of smoothing in classical crossings of a virtual link diagram and suitable weight functions, there is provided a recurrent construction for new invariants. It is demonstrated by explicit examples that newly defined polynomial invariants are stronger than F-polynomials.


Author(s):  
Maxim Ivanov

It is known that connected sum of two virtual knots is not uniquely determined and depends on knot diagrams and choosing the points to be connected. But different connected sums of the same virtual knots cannot be distinguished by Kauffman’s affine index polynomial. For any pair of virtual knots [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]-dwrithe [Formula: see text] we construct an infinite family of different connected sums of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] which can be distinguished by [Formula: see text]-polynomials.


Author(s):  
Heather A. D ◽  
Aaron Kaestner

In this paper, we define the virtual Alexander polynomial following the works of Boden et al. (2016) [Alexander invariants for virtual knots, J. Knot Theory Ramications 24(3) (2015) 1550009] and Kaestner and Kauffman [Parity biquandles, in Knots in Poland. III. Part 1, Banach Center Publications, Vol. 100 (Polish Academy of Science Mathematical Institute, Warsaw, 2014), pp. 131–151]. The properties of this invariant are explored and some examples are computed. In particular, the invariant demonstrates that many virtual knots cannot be unknotted by crossing changes on only odd crossings.


Author(s):  
Vassily Olegovich Manturov

The aim of the present paper is to construct series of invariants of free knots (flat virtual knots, virtual knots) valued in free groups (and also free products of cyclic groups).


Author(s):  
Hans U. Boden ◽  
Micah Chrisman

We use the Bar-Natan [Formula: see text]-correspondence to identify the generalized Alexander polynomial of a virtual knot with the Alexander polynomial of a two component welded link. We show that the [Formula: see text]-map is functorial under concordance, and also that Satoh’s Tube map (from welded links to ribbon knotted tori in [Formula: see text]) is functorial under concordance. In addition, we extend classical results of Chen, Milnor and Hillman on the lower central series of link groups to links in thickened surfaces. Our main result is that the generalized Alexander polynomial vanishes on any knot in a thickened surface which is virtually concordant to a homologically trivial knot. In particular, this shows that it vanishes on virtually slice knots. We apply it to complete the calculation of the slice genus for virtual knots with four crossings and to determine non-sliceness for a number of 5-crossing and 6-crossing virtual knots.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
Noureen A. Khan ◽  
Abdullah S. Khan

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingying Deng ◽  
Xian’an Jin ◽  
Louis H. Kauffman

In this paper, we give two new criteria of detecting the checkerboard colorability of virtual links by using the odd writhe and the arrow polynomial of virtual links, respectively. As a result, we prove that 6 virtual knots are not checkerboard colorable, leaving only one virtual knot whose checkerboard colorability is unknown among all virtual knots up to four classical crossings.


Author(s):  
Sandy Ganzell ◽  
Allison Henrich

Mosaic diagrams for knots were first introduced in 2008 by Lomanoco and Kauffman for the purpose of building a quantum knot system. Since then, many others have explored the structure of these knot mosaic diagrams, as they are interesting objects of study in their own right. Knot mosaics have been generalized by Garduño to virtual knots, by including an additional tile type to represent virtual crossings. There is another interpretation of virtual knots, however, as knot diagrams on surfaces, which inspires this work. By viewing classical mosaic diagrams as [Formula: see text]-gons and gluing edges of these polygons, we obtain knots on surfaces that can be viewed as virtual knots. These virtual mosaics are our present objects of study. In this paper, we provide a set of moves that can be performed on virtual mosaics that preserve knot and link type, we show that any virtual knot or link can be represented as a virtual mosaic, and we provide several computational results related to virtual mosaic numbers for small classical and virtual knots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document