branching programs
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

236
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Prasad Chaugule ◽  
Nutan Limaye ◽  
Aditya Varre

We present polynomial families complete for the well-studied algebraic complexity classes VF, VBP, VP, and VNP. The polynomial families are based on the homomorphism polynomials studied in the recent works of Durand et al. (2014) and Mahajan et al. (2018). We consider three different variants of graph homomorphisms, namely injective homomorphisms , directed homomorphisms , and injective directed homomorphisms , and obtain polynomial families complete for VF, VBP, VP, and VNP under each one of these. The polynomial families have the following properties: • The polynomial families complete for VF, VBP, and VP are model independent, i.e., they do not use a particular instance of a formula, algebraic branching programs, or circuit for characterising VF, VBP, or VP, respectively. • All the polynomial families are hard under p -projections.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Sinhababu ◽  
Thomas Thierauf

AbstractGiven a multivariate polynomial computed by an arithmetic branching program (ABP) of size s, we show that all its factors can be computed by arithmetic branching programs of size poly(s). Kaltofen gave a similar result for polynomials computed by arithmetic circuits. The previously known best upper bound for ABP-factors was poly $$ (s^{ {\rm \log} s}) $$ ( s log s ) .


2020 ◽  
Vol 177 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-93
Author(s):  
Purnata Ghosal ◽  
B.V. Raghavendra Rao

We consider the problem of obtaining parameterized lower bounds for the size of arithmetic circuits computing polynomials with the degree of the polynomial as the parameter. We consider the following special classes of multilinear algebraic branching programs: 1) Read Once Oblivious Branching Programs (ROABPs), 2) Strict interval branching programs, 3) Sum of read once formulas with restricted ordering. We obtain parameterized lower bounds (i.e., nΩ(t(k)) lower bound for some function t of k) on the size of the above models computing a multilinear polynomial that can be computed by a depth four circuit of size g(k)nO(1) for some computable function g. Further, we obtain a parameterized separation between ROABPs and read-2 ABPs. This is obtained by constructing a degree k polynomial that can be computed by a read-2 ABP of small size such that the rank of the partial derivative matrix under any partition of the variables is large.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 1392-1407
Author(s):  
Atsuki Nagao ◽  
Kazuhisa Seto ◽  
Junichi Teruyama
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alexsander Andrade de Melo ◽  
Mateus De Oliveira Oliveira

A fundamental drawback that arises when one is faced with the task of deterministically certifying solutions to computational problems in PSPACE is the fact that witnesses may have superpolynomial size, assuming that NP is not equal to PSPACE. Therefore, the complexity of such a deterministic verifier may already be super-polynomially lower-bounded by the size of a witness. In this work, we introduce a new symbolic framework to address this drawback. More precisely, we introduce a PSPACE-hard notion of symbolic constraint satisfaction problem where both instances and solutions for these instances are implicitly represented by ordered decision diagrams (i.e. read-once, oblivious, branching programs). Our main result states that given an ordered decision diagram D of length k and width w specifying a CSP instance, one can determine in time f(w,w')*k whether there is an ODD of width at most w' encoding a solution for this instance. Intuitively, while the parameter w quantifies the complexity of the instance, the parameter w' quantifies the complexity of a prospective solution. We show that CSPs of constant width can be used to formalize natural PSPACE hard problems, such as reachability of configurations for Turing machines working in nondeterministic linear space. For such problems, our main result immediately yields an algorithm that determines the existence of solutions of width w in time g(w)*n, where g:N->N is a suitable computable function, and n is the size of the input.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Rohit Gurjar ◽  
Ben Lee Volk
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. STOC18-242-STOC18-299
Author(s):  
Mark Braverman ◽  
Gil Cohen ◽  
Sumegha Garg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document