Implementation of Tactical Decision Aids Based on Event Knowledge Graph

This paper proposes a new tactical decision aids method based on event knowledge graph (EventKG). In the warfare domain, EventKG can be constructed through event types design, event network construction and transition probability computation between events. Initially, four event classes are introduced in accordance with the OODA loop, and eighteen subclasses are further decomposed. With the aids of a common event template, all the events taking place in the battle field can be described. Event networks are built by adopting the hierarchical task network (HTN) and described through Bayesian network, to exhibit various relations between battle events. Transition probability, namely the occurrence probability of next possible event, is computed by using the prior probability and conditional probability of event occurring. On the basis of structured EventKG, entity knowledge graph (EKG) and entity relation knowledge graph (ERKG), tactical decision aid instructions can be generated by combining with the battlefield situation information.

Schema representations in distinct brain networks support narrative memory during encoding and retrieval

Schematic prior knowledge can scaffold the construction of event memories during perception and also provide structured cues to guide memory search during retrieval. We measured the activation of story-specific and schematic representations using fMRI while participants were presented with 16 stories and then recalled each of the narratives, and related these activations to memory for specific story details. We predicted that schema representations in mPFC would be correlated with successful recall of story details. In keeping with this prediction, an anterior mPFC region showed a significant correlation between activation of schema representations at encoding and subsequent behavioral recall performance; however, this mPFC region was not implicated in schema representation during retrieval. More generally, our analyses revealed largely distinct brain networks at encoding and retrieval in which schema activation was related to successful recall. These results provide new insight into when and where event knowledge can support narrative memory.

Examining the validity of three methods of measuring pre-readers’ knowledge of storybook events

Planning intervention for narrative comprehension deficits requires a thorough understanding of a child’s skill in all component domains. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of three methods of measuring pre-readers’ event knowledge, an important predictor of story comprehension. Thirty-eight typically developing children (12 males; 26 females) between the ages of 30–59 months ( M = 42.05 SD = 7.62) completed three measures – verbal account, enactment, picture-sequencing – that tapped their knowledge of two different events before listening to stories based on each of those events and completing story comprehension tasks. Scores for verbal account and enactment, but not for picture sequencing, (1) were moderately correlated with comprehension scores for the corresponding story; (2) reflected differential knowledge of the two events, though not in the expected direction; (3) were moderately correlated with one another in the case of each story. In general measures for the same event were more highly correlated with one another than with measures of the other event. Overall, results suggest that verbal account and enactment may yield information useful for clinicians planning intervention for children with narrative comprehension deficits.

Children’s accuracy in answering Why and How Come questions

Children’s developing understanding of language may influence their ability to accurately respond to questions inquiring about their event knowledge (i.e., Why and How Come questions), potentially creating misinterpretations in adult–child communication. The present study examined 120 5-, 7-, and 9-year-old’s accuracy in responding to Why and How Come questions about the cause of their behaviors. Children’s accuracy improved with age, highlighting a developmental milestone whereby children become highly accurate by 7 years of age. Further, the semantic differences in question type did not influence children’s responses, as there were no differences in children’s accuracy when answering Why or How Come questions. The findings from this study highlight the developmental shift in children’s abilities to answer Why and How Come questions, and thus the importance of considering the age and linguistic abilities of the child when inquiring about their event knowledge.