prostatic arterial embolization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Maoqiang Wang ◽  
Feng Duan ◽  
Jinlong Zhang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Liping Guo ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Maoqiang Wang ◽  
Jinlong Zhang ◽  
Feng Duan ◽  
Huiyi Ye ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
Maoqiang Wang ◽  
Jinlong Zhang ◽  
Kai Yuan ◽  
Chengjian Sun ◽  
Xiaojing Zhang ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Jinlong Zhang ◽  
Jieyu Yan ◽  
Yang Guan ◽  
Xuedong Sun ◽  
Xiaomei Tian ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 1116-1124
Author(s):  
Dirk Schnapauff ◽  
Andreas Maxeiner ◽  
Gero Wieners ◽  
Timm Denecke ◽  
Bernd Hamm ◽  
...  

Background Due to the broad variability of the prostatic artery (PA), its origin, small calibers, and tortuous courses, prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) is challenging, time-consuming, and results in high radiation doses. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of PA detection using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) performed from the aortic bifurcation in combination with a semi-automatic detection software in comparison to oblique view digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with internal iliac artery (IIA) injection. Material and Methods Twenty-two consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, IRB-approved study between July and December 2017. CBCT from the aorta and 30° oblique-view DSA from both IIAs were obtained for PA detection. Results of suggested PAs from the semi-automatic vessel detection software after CBCT and IIA DSA were compared. Moreover, dose area product (DAP) was recorded. Statistical analysis included Spearman’s correlation, Mann–Whitney U test, and the Wilcoxon test considering P<0.05 as significant. Results PA type was classified significantly better with CBCT compared to DSA ( P=0.047). In IIA DSA, PAs could not be identified in 18% on the left and in 17% on the right side. CBCT detected all PAs, although truncation occurred in 59% because of the limited field of view. Mean DAP of the whole procedure was 257,161.32±127,909.36 mGy*cm2. Mean DAPs were for a single DSA 14,502.51±9,437.67 mGy*cm2 and for one CBCT 15,589.23±2,722.49 mGy*cm2. A mean of 14.82 DSAs and only one CBCT were performed. CBCT accounted for 6% and DSA for 84% of the entire DAP of the procedure. Conclusion CBCT with semi-automatic feeding vessel detection software detects PAs more accurately than IIA DSA and may reduce radiation dose.



2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-658
Author(s):  
Jae Hung Jung ◽  
Eu Chang Hwang ◽  
Philipp Dahm


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document