bucephala albeola
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Gauthier
Keyword(s):  


2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan N. Ellis-Felege ◽  
Cassandra G. Skaggs ◽  
Gregory A. Knutsen

Buffleheads (Bucephala albeola) predominantly nest in the boreal forests and aspen parklands of Canada and Alaska. Historically, Buffleheads were common migrants but not summer residents in Minnesota. However, recent observations in Minnesota and surrounding states suggest increased breeding activity in the region. In 1978, the first Bufflehead brood in Minnesota was recorded at East Park Wildlife Management Area. Annually, Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) has conducted pair and brood surveys, with species-specific records available from 1990 to 2014. We report an increase in numbers of Bufflehead breeding pairs and broods at Agassiz NWR and new pair observations in surrounding areas.



2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Hurley-Sanders ◽  
R. Scott Larsen ◽  
Brigid Troan ◽  
Michael Loomis


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Gauthier
Keyword(s):  


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Gauthier
Keyword(s):  






2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
James K. Finley ◽  
Suzanne Huot

Observations of a male Bufflehead (Bucephela albeola) paired with a female Common Goldeneye (Bucephela clangula) in northern Alberta in 1995 and of a hybrid male Common Goldeneye × Bufflehead photographed near Victoria, British Columbia, in March 2009 provide the first combined evidence of interspecific mate choice and out-crossing in Bucephala albeola. Since 1999, there have been at least 10 unofficial records, including photographs, of Common Goldeneye × Bufflehead hybrids posted on the Internet, as well as 6 records of hybridization with Hooded Mergansers (Lophodytes cucullatus). In all cases, where evident in Common Goldeneye × Buffleheads, gold eyes and pink feet were expressed and social affiliation was with Common Goldeneyes, suggesting matrilineage with that species. Because most attention is given to the hybrid - and to male hybrids at that - rather than to the progenitors, the theory of mate attraction, through sexual imprinting of males, is biased toward the paternal viewpoint. It appears that there is more plasticity in mate choice, particularly by the female. The opportunity to observe mate choice is much rarer than the hybrid outcome, while the odds of the latter have increased many fold in the last decade due to advances in Internet communication and digital photography. This exercise illustrates the ability of the Internet to amplify the prevalence of rare phenomena many fold over historical records.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document