gaze alternation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingna Zhang ◽  
Katie B. Needham ◽  
Serena Juma ◽  
Xuemei Si ◽  
François Martin

AbstractResearch on social cognitive ability in domestic cats is limited. The current study investigated social referencing in cats when exposed to first, a solvable, and then, an unsolvable scenario (i.e., reachable and unreachable treats) in the presence of either an attentive or an inattentive caregiver. Cats expressed more gaze alternation (P = 0.013), but less interaction with the caregiver (P = 0.048) and approached the treat container less frequently (P = 0.017) during the unsolvable test, compared to the solvable test. When in the presence of an attentive caregiver, cats initiated first gaze at the caregiver faster (P = 0.001); gazed at the caregiver for longer (P = 0.034); and approached the treat more frequently (P = 0.040), compared to when the caregiver was inattentive. Significant interaction was observed between test and caregiver’s attentional state on the expression of sequential behavior, a type of showing behavior. Cats exhibited this behavior marginally more with attentive caregivers, compared to inattentive caregivers, but only during the unsolvable test. There was a decrease in sequential behavior during the unsolvable test, compared to solvable test, but this was only seen with inattentive caregivers (P = 0.018). Our results suggest that gaze alternation is a behavior reliably indicating social referencing in cats and that cats’ social communication with humans is affected by the person’s availability for visual interaction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Marshall-Pescini ◽  
E. Colombo ◽  
C. Passalacqua ◽  
I. Merola ◽  
E. Prato-Previde

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Anderson ◽  
Hiroko Kuwahata ◽  
Kazuo Fujita

Gesture ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 75-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Leavens ◽  
William D. Hopkins

It is well-established that chimpanzees vocalize more in the presence of relatively large amounts of food. The present study administered four trials in random order to each of 20 chimpanzees: (1) small piece of fruit, placed near to cage (~30 cm.), (2) large piece of fruit, placed near to cage, (3) small piece of fruit, placed far from cage (~130 cm.), and (4) large piece of fruit, placed far from cage. On arrival of an experimenter, the chimpanzees not only vocalized more in the presence of the large piece of fruit, confirming previous studies’ findings, but also exhibited more multimodal behavior (vocalizations, manual gestures, and gaze alternation between the food and the experimenter), which extends previous research. More gaze alternation was exhibited to food placed more peripherally. Arousal may be indexed in this species by the number of modalities in which they communicate.


Gesture ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 75-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Leavens ◽  
William D. Hopkins

It is well-established that chimpanzees vocalize more in the presence of relatively large amounts of food. The present study administered four trials in random order to each of 20 chimpanzees: (1) small piece of fruit, placed near to cage (~30 cm.), (2) large piece of fruit, placed near to cage, (3) small piece of fruit, placed far from cage (~130 cm.), and (4) large piece of fruit, placed far from cage. On arrival of an experimenter, the chimpanzees not only vocalized more in the presence of the large piece of fruit, confirming previous studies’ findings, but also exhibited more multimodal behavior (vocalizations, manual gestures, and gaze alternation between the food and the experimenter), which extends previous research. More gaze alternation was exhibited to food placed more peripherally. Arousal may be indexed in this species by the number of modalities in which they communicate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document