the deficit at ruin
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onno J. Boxma ◽  
Esther Frostig ◽  
David Perry

AbstractWe consider a Cramér–Lundberg insurance risk process with the added feature of reinsurance. If an arriving claim finds the reserve below a certain threshold γ, or if it would bring the reserve below that level, then a reinsurer pays part of the claim. Using fluctuation theory and the theory of scale functions of spectrally negative Lévy processes, we derive expressions for the Laplace transform of the time to ruin and of the joint distribution of the deficit at ruin and the surplus before ruin. We specify these results in much more detail for the threshold set-up in the case of proportional reinsurance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 915-938
Author(s):  
Martin Jacobsen

The risk processes considered in this paper are generated by an underlying Markov process with a regenerative structure and an independent sequence of independent and identically distributed claims. Between the arrivals of claims the process increases at a rate which is a nonnegative function of the present value of the Markov process. The intensity for a claim to occur is another nonnegative function of the value of the Markov process. The claim arrival times are the regeneration times for the Markov process. Two-sided claims are allowed, but the distribution of the positive claims is assumed to have a Laplace transform that is a rational function. The main results describe the joint Laplace transform of the time at ruin and the deficit at ruin. The method used consists in finding partial eigenfunctions for the generator of the joint process consisting of the Markov process and the accumulated claims process, a joint process which is also Markov. These partial eigenfunctions are then used to find a martingale that directly leads to an expression for the desired Laplace transform. In the final section, three examples are given involving different types of the underlying Markov process.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (04) ◽  
pp. 915-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Jacobsen

The risk processes considered in this paper are generated by an underlying Markov process with a regenerative structure and an independent sequence of independent and identically distributed claims. Between the arrivals of claims the process increases at a rate which is a nonnegative function of the present value of the Markov process. The intensity for a claim to occur is another nonnegative function of the value of the Markov process. The claim arrival times are the regeneration times for the Markov process. Two-sided claims are allowed, but the distribution of the positive claims is assumed to have a Laplace transform that is a rational function. The main results describe the joint Laplace transform of the time at ruin and the deficit at ruin. The method used consists in finding partial eigenfunctions for the generator of the joint process consisting of the Markov process and the accumulated claims process, a joint process which is also Markov. These partial eigenfunctions are then used to find a martingale that directly leads to an expression for the desired Laplace transform. In the final section, three examples are given involving different types of the underlying Markov process.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-185
Author(s):  
Georgios Psarrakos ◽  
Michael Tsatsomeros

A renewal model in risk theory is considered, where $\overline{H}(u,y)$ is the tail of the distribution of the deficit at ruin with initial surplus u and $\overline{F}(y)$ is the tail of the ladder height distribution. Conditions are derived under which the ratio $\overline{H}(u,y)/\overline{F}(u+y)$ is nondecreasing in u for any y≥0. In particular, it is proven that if the ladder height distribution is stable and DFR or phase type, then the above ratio is nondecreasing in u. As a byproduct of this monotonicity, an upper bound and an asymptotic result for $\overline{H}(u,y)$ are derived. Examples are given to illustrate the monotonicity results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document