limit pricing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

99
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Willi Semmler ◽  
Giovanni Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Behnaz Minooei Fard ◽  
Joao Braga


2020 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 103995
Author(s):  
Gerard van der Meijden ◽  
Cees Withagen


2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 1148-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Sweeting ◽  
James W. Roberts ◽  
Chris Gedge


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 101118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard van der Meijden ◽  
Cees Withagen


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-194
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusuf

Main research material for Liability of Creditors and Upper Auction Officers Determination of Auction Limit Prices Under Depreciation Value, with the formulation of the problem What is the legal effect of auctioning objects whose auction limit is below the dependency and whether creditors and auction officials are accountable for auction limit pricing below the value of dependents. The conclusions are as follows: The act of creditor in determining the price of the auction limit below the value of the liability has fulfilled the whole element of article 1365 of the Civil Code so The legal consequence of auction object sales is that the auction price is below the value of the hold and if the object of the right of sale is sold under the value of the mortgage, the auction can be requested by the court. The creditor is liable for the price of the auction limit below the value of the creditor because the creditor as the seller does have the right to set the auction limit price but still must pay attention to the appropriateness of the specified auction limit price and the Auction Officer is not liable for the auction limit price below the hold value because the Auction Guidelines state that the auction limit price is not the responsibility of the KPKNL or the Class II Auction Officer



2018 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 250-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eray Cumbul ◽  
Gábor Virág
Keyword(s):  


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 153-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard van der Meijden ◽  
Karolina Ryszka ◽  
Cees Withagen
Keyword(s):  


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Klaus Fischer
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Stephen Martin
Keyword(s):  


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Cherbonnier ◽  
Marc Ivaldi ◽  
Catherine Muller-Vibes ◽  
Karine Van Der Straeten

Abstract This paper is aimed at evaluating the net gains and trade-offs at stake in implementing the competition of the rail mode in the long distance passenger market either by means of franchise or by an open access mechanism. We simulate the outcomes of competition in and for the market using a differentiated-products oligopoly model allowing for inter- and intra-modal competition in a long distance passenger market. Specifically we first calibrate the model using data describing high speed lines in France and show that the incumbent railway operator’s strategy does not simply boil down to a short-term profit maximization (e.g. because of existing regulation or limit-pricing strategy). This yields two important results when simulating competition. First, whether it is for or in the market, the opening to competition does not guarantee a decrease in prices in favor of passengers. Second, the effects of opening up to competition for the market are relatively predictable and potentially positive, while those of opening up to competition in the market remain very uncertain.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document