space constancy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

26
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Szinte ◽  
David Aagten-Murphy ◽  
Donatas Jonikaitis ◽  
Luca Wollenberg ◽  
Heiner Deubel

AbstractTo achieve visual space constancy, our brain remaps eye-centered projections of visual objects across saccades. Here, we measured saccade trajectory curvature following the presentation of visual, auditory, and audiovisual distractors in a double-step saccade task to investigate if this stability mechanism also accounts for localized sounds. We found that saccade trajectories systematically curved away from the position at which either a light or a sound was presented, suggesting that both modalities are represented in eye-centered oculomotor centers. Importantly, the same effect was observed when the distractor preceded the execution of the first saccade. These results suggest that oculomotor centers keep track of visual, auditory and audiovisual objects by remapping their eye-centered representations across saccades. Furthermore, they argue for the existence of a supra-modal map which keeps track of multi-sensory object locations across our movements to create an impression of space constancy.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Szinte ◽  
David Aagten-Murphy ◽  
Donatas Jonikaitis ◽  
Luca Wollenberg ◽  
Heiner Deubel

AbstractTo achieve visual space constancy, our brain remaps eye-centered projections of visual objects across saccades. Here, we measured saccade trajectory curvature following the presentation of visual, auditory, and audiovisual distractors in a double-step saccade task to investigate if this stability mechanism also accounts for localized sounds. We found that saccade trajectories systematically curved away from the position at which either a light or a sound was presented, suggesting that both modalities are represented in eye-centered oculomotor centers. Importantly, the same effect was observed when the distractor preceded the execution of the first saccade. These results suggest that oculomotor centers keep track of visual, auditory and audiovisual objects by remapping their eye-centered representations across saccades. Furthermore, they argue for the existence of a supra-modal map which keeps track of multi-sensory object locations across our movements to create an impression of space constancy.



2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 164-175
Author(s):  
Michael J. Spivey ◽  
Brandon J. Batzloff


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 960-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatol G. Feldman

Although action and perception are different behaviors, they are likely to be interrelated, as implied by the notions of perception-action coupling and active sensing. Traditionally, it has been assumed that the nervous system directly preprograms motor commands required for actions and uses a copy of them called efference copy (EC) to also influence our senses. This review offers a critical analysis of the EC concept by identifying its limitations. An alternative to the EC concept is based on the experimentally confirmed notion that sensory signals from receptors are perceived relative to referent signals specified by the brain. These referents also underlie the control of motor actions by predetermining where, in the spatial domain, muscles can work without preprogramming how they should work in terms of motor commands or EC. This approach helps solve several problems of action and explain several sensory experiences, including position sense and the sense that the world remains stationary despite changes in its retinal image during eye or body motion (visual space constancy). The phantom limb phenomenon and other kinesthetic illusions are also explained within this framework.



2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Szinte ◽  
P. Cavanagh




2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
C. Morvan ◽  
M. Wexler


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiner Deubel ◽  
Carmen Koch ◽  
Bruce Bridgeman
Keyword(s):  


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Jaekl ◽  
Laurence Harris

AbstractThe perceived distance between objects has been found to decrease over time in memory, demonstrating a partial failure of space constancy. Such mislocalization has been attributed to a generalized compression effect in memory. We confirmed this drift with a pair of remembered dot positions but did not find a compression of perceived distance when the space between the dots was filled with a connecting line. When the dot pairs were viewed eccentrically the compression in memory was substantially less. These results are in line with a combination of factors previously demonstrated to cause distortion in spatial memory — foveal bias and memory averaging — rather than a general compression of remembered visual space. Our findings indicate that object shape does not appear to be vulnerable to failures of space constancy observed with remembered positions.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document