laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 994-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Han You ◽  
Chen-Ying Huang ◽  
Hsuan Su ◽  
Chien-Min Han ◽  
Chyi-Long Lee ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Alkatout ◽  
Liselotte Mettler


Hysterectomy ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 467-480
Author(s):  
Bernd Bojahr ◽  
Garri Tchartchian


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Harald Krentel ◽  
Rudy Leon De Wilde

Minimally invasive hysterectomy is a standard procedure. Different approaches, as laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, and subtotal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy, have been described and evaluated by various investigations as safe and cost-effective methods. In particular, in comparison to abdominal hysterectomy, the minimally invasive methods have undoubted advantages for the patients. The main reason for a primary abdominal hysterectomy or conversion to abdominal hysterectomy during a minimal invasive approach is the uterine size. We describe our course of action in the retrospective analysis of five cases of total minimal-access hysterectomy, combining the laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy and the vaginal extirpation of the cervix in uterine myomatosis with a uterine weight of more than 1000 grams, and discuss the factors that limit the use of laparoscopy in the treatment of big uteri. Trail Registration. The case report is registered in Research Registry under the UIN researchregistry743.



2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Tirosh ◽  
Neta Benshalom Tirosh ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
Boaz Sheizaf




Author(s):  
Liselotte Mettler ◽  
Ibrahim Alkatout


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. S115
Author(s):  
S.-H. You ◽  
H.-H. Kuo ◽  
C.-Y. Huang ◽  
C.-L. Lee ◽  
C.-F. Yen


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document