referral center
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2495
(FIVE YEARS 921)

H-INDEX

56
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Author(s):  
Elif Elibol ◽  
Özgenur Koçak ◽  
Mecit Sancak ◽  
Bengi Arslan ◽  
Fatih Gül ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mathias Roth ◽  
Sebastian Dierse ◽  
Jan Alder ◽  
Christoph Holtmann ◽  
Gerd Geerling

Abstract Background Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is an orphan disease, with an estimated prevalence of 1–5/10,000. No data regarding the incidence exists. The primary aim was to evaluate incidence and prevalence of NK at a tertiary referral center in Germany, and the secondary aim was to analyze demographic parameters, etiology, and clinical features and therapeutic outcomes. Methods and material All patients treated for NK with serum eye drops (SED), amnionic membrane transplantation (AMT), or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 2013–2017 were identified. Age, sex, etiology of NK, visual acuity, disease stage, treatment, and visual acuity were analyzed. Incidence and prevalence of NK in our hospital and the overall population of the city were calculated. Results In 63 eyes of 60 patients (56.7% male; 68 ± 16 years), the most common underlying diseases were herpetic infections (23.8%), neurological causes (19%), and diabetes mellitus (14.3%). The annual incidence of NK in our tertiary referral center ranges between 5/10,000 and 3/10,000, the prevalence between 9/10,00 and 22/10,000. In all patients treated with corneal ulcers, the prevalence was up to 27% (2706/10,000). The incidence in the overall population is estimated at 0.1–0.3/10,000, the prevalence at 0.2–0.5/10,000 to 0.5/10,000. Conclusion Based on our assessment, the prevalence of NK in the overall population is lower than estimated before. However, in patients with corneal ulcers, the percentage of NK is comparably high. The disease may still be underdiagnosed due to the variety of underlying disorders and unknown comorbidities. Thus, in cases of therapy-refractive superficial keratopathy or ulcerations, NK should be considered more frequently.


Author(s):  
Ligia Maria Alves dos Santos Pertence ◽  
Paulo Fernando Souto Bittencourt ◽  
Isabela Furtado de Mendonça Picinin ◽  
Laura Maria de Lima Belizário Facury Lasmar
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ana Cláudia Mendes do Nascimento ◽  
Diogo Fernandes dos Santos ◽  
Douglas Eulálio Antunes ◽  
Maria Aparecida Gonçalves ◽  
Marcela Araujo de Oliveira Santana ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohamed ELSHERIF ◽  
Mohamed ELSHARKAWI ◽  
Wael TAWFICK ◽  
Baker GHONEIM ◽  
Niamh HYNES ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110675
Author(s):  
María I Gaitán ◽  
Melanie Sanchez ◽  
Mauricio F Farez ◽  
Marcela P Fiol ◽  
Maria C Ysrraelit ◽  
...  

Objective: Most contemporary data concerning the frequency and causes of multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis are from North America and Europe with different healthcare system structure and resources than countries in Latin America. We sought to determine the frequency, and potential contributors to MS misdiagnosis in patients evaluated at an MS referral center in Argentina. Methods: The study was a retrospective medical record review. We included patients evaluated at the MS Clinic at Fleni between April 2013 and March 2021. Diagnoses prior to consultation, final diagnoses after consultation, demographic, clinical and paraclinical data, and treatment were extracted and classified. Results: Seven hundred thirty-six patients were identified. Five hundred seventy-two presented with an established diagnosis of MS and after evaluation, misdiagnosis was identified in 89 (16%). Women were at 83% greater risk of misdiagnosis ( p = 0.034). The most frequent alternative diagnoses were cerebrovascular disease, radiological isolated syndrome (RIS), and headache. Seventy-four (83%) of misdiagnosed patients presented with a syndrome atypical for demyelination, 62 (70%) had an atypical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 54 (61%) were prescribed disease-modifying therapy. Conclusion: Sixteen percent of patients with established MS were subsequently found to have been misdiagnosed. Women were at higher risk for misdiagnosis. Expert application of the McDonald criteria may prevent misdiagnosis and its associated morbidity and healthcare system cost.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 119263-119282
Author(s):  
Emily Caroliny Souza Tibães ◽  
Ana Clara Neri ◽  
Mariana Paranhos Magalhães ◽  
Camila Teles Gonçalves ◽  
Bárbara Nobre Lafetá ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document