Tongue stretching: technique and clinical proposal

Objectives The tongue is an organ with multiple functions, from sucking to phonation, from swallowing to postural control and equilibrium. An incorrect position or mechanics of the tongue can causes sucking problems in the newborn or atypical swallowing in the adult, with repercussions on the position of the head and neck, up to influencing upright posture and other problems. Tongue dysfunctions are quite frequent (10–15%) in the population. For the manual therapist, this frequency indicates one to two subjects every 30 patients. Exercises have been proposed to improve the tone and strength of the swallowing muscles but the results are not so clear in the literature. The aim of this study is to describe and provide a tongue muscle normalization technique that helps the manual therapist in the treatment of problems related to it. Methods The literature has been investigated through pubmed, Google scholar of the last 10 years, the keywords used and combined with the Boolean operators AND and OR, are: “tongue, tongue habits, tongue diseases, taste disorder, neck pain, posture, postural balance, atypical swallowing, muscle stretching exercise, tissue expansion, soft tissue therapy, osteopathic manipulative treatment”. Results and Conclusions The technique is possible to be executed even in a sitting position, in the case the patient is unable to assume a supine position, the subject should provides immediate feedback that allows the therapist to understand if the technique has been correctly executed. The simplicity of execution and application of the technique makes it a possible and immediate therapeutic tool in the clinical setting.

Recovery expectations of neck pain patients do not predict treatments outcome in manual therapy

Patient recovery expectations can predict treatment outcome. Little is known about the association of patient recovery expectations on treatment outcome in patients with neck pain consulting a manual therapist. This study evaluates the predictive value of recovery expectations in neck pain patients consulting manual therapists in the Netherlands. The primary outcome measure ‘recovery’ is defined as ‘reduction in pain and perceived improvement’. A prospective cohort study a total of 1195 neck pain patients. Patients completed the Patient Expectancies List (PEL) at baseline (3 item questionnaire, score range from 3 to 12), functional status (NDI), the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) for recovery (7-points Likert scale) post treatment and pain scores (NRS) at baseline and post treatment. The relationship between recovery expectancy and recovery (dichotomized GPE scores) was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Patients generally reported high recovery expectations on all three questions of the PEL (mean sumscores ranging from 11.3 to 11.6). When adjusted for covariates the PEL sum-score did not predict recovery (explained variance was 0.10 for the total PEL). Separately, the first question of the PEL showed predictive potential (OR 3.7; 95%CI 0.19–73.74) for recovery, but failed to reach statistical significance. In this study patient recovery expectations did not predict treatment outcome. Variables predicting recovery were recurrence and duration of pain. The precise relationship between patient recovery expectations and outcome is complex and still inconclusive. Research on patient expectancy would benefit from more consistent use of theoretical expectancy and outcome models.

IMMEDIATE EFFECTS OF SPINAL MANIPULATION COMPARED TO MULLIGAN SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDE MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE IN CERVICAL PAIN

OBJECTIVE To analyze immediate treatment effects of spinal manipulation compared tomulligan sustained natural apophyseal glide mobilization technique in cervical pain. STUDY DESIGN Quasi Experimental Study STUDY SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS A sample of 150 participants were included in this study and equally divided in two groups. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either SNAG mobilization (n = 75), or a manipulation (n =75). The SNAG technique was applied at the cervical spinal levels with active flexion in sitting. Manipulation was done by an experienced manual therapist. INTERVENTIONS VAS and Neck disability index (NDI). RESULTS The use of manual therapies decreased the pain intensity in the mulligan and the manipulation group; this difference was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). CONCLUSION It was observed that both the techniques have shown positive results but in comparison, mulligan technique is more effective than manipulation.