Sorting Device Coding Print Quality Machine on Packing Box Prototype Utilizing Optical Character Recognition

The design of a system that can recognize the characters printed by the coding machine so that it can then determine the assessment of very good and bad prints, is the goal of this research. This system is useful as an indicator of an indication of a problem with the coding machine which is indicated by the number of products rejected by the system. In addition, this system is an effort to reduce printing errors so that they are sorted and do not pass to the market, thus causing misinformation to the public. This system is in the form of a moving conveyor table that has a firing area box and a reject rod as a product separator. The OCR method is programmed in a computer that is part of the system, to be able to recognize the characters printed by this coding machine. USB to TTL which functions as serial communication from the Laptop to the Microcontroller, is a complement to this tool. Testing as many as 60 times on 12 types of characters, this system has been carried out on this tool. There are six types of good characters and six types of bad characters, which have been provided. Of the 60 tests, the results were four failed tests. That is, the percentage of success of this tool is 93.33%, and the percentage of error is 6.66%.

Changes in properties of tar obtained during underground coal gasification process

In this study, the composition of tars collected during a six-day underground coal gasification (UCG) test at the experimental mine ‘Barbara’ in Poland in 2013 was examined. During the test, tar samples were taken every day from the liquid product separator and analysed by the methods used for testing properties of typical coke oven (coal) tar. The obtained results were compared with each other and with the data for coal tar. As gasification progressed, a decreasing trend in the water content and an increasing trend in the ash content were observed. The tars tested were characterized by large changes in the residue after coking and content of parts insoluble in toluene and by smaller fluctuations in the content of parts insoluble in quinoline. All tested samples were characterized by very high distillation losses, while for samples starting from the third day of gasification, a clear decrease in losses was visible. A chromatographic analysis showed that there were no major differences in composition between the tested tars and that none of the tar had a dominant component such as naphthalene in coal tar. The content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in UCG tars is several times lower than that in coal tar. No light monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes—BTEX) were found in the analysed tars, which results from the fact that these compounds, due to their high volatility, did not separate from the process gas in the liquid product separator.

Changes in Properties of Tar Obtained During Underground Coal Gasification Process

In this study, the composition of tars collected during a six-day underground coal gasification (UCG) test at the experimental mine ‘Barbara’ in Poland in 2013 was examined. During the test, tar samples were taken every day from the liquid product separator and analysed by the methods used for testing properties of typical coke oven (coal) tar. The obtained results were compared with each other and with the data for coal tar. As gasification progressed, a decreasing trend in the water content and an increasing trend in the ash content were observed. The tars tested were characterized by large changes in the residue after coking and content of parts insoluble in toluene and by smaller fluctuations in the content of parts insoluble in quinoline. All tested samples were characterized by very high distillation losses, while for samples starting from the third day of gasification, a clear decrease in losses was visible. A chromatographic analysis showed that there were no major differences in composition between the tested tars and that none of the tar had a dominant component such as naphthalene in coal tar. The content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in UCG tars is several times lower than that in coal tar. No light monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes - BTEX) were found in the analysed tars, which results from the fact that these compounds, due to their high volatility, did not separate from the process gas in the liquid product separator.