houtman abrolhos islands
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Veera M. Haslam ◽  
Mike van Keulen

Predation by the corallivorous gastropod Drupella cornus is well studied in the tropical and subtropical waters of the Indo-Pacific, including Ningaloo Reef and the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia. In 1983, Drupella was not found in the Pocillopora colonies of Rottnest Island (Black and Prince 1983), and there has only been one record of D. cornus on Rottnest Island until today. We show the first feeding aggregations of D. cornus on these higher-latitude reefs of Rottnest Island, and highlight the importance of these findings.


Coral Reefs ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Buckee ◽  
Charitha Pattiaratchi ◽  
Jennifer Verduin

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0147628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. Markey ◽  
Dave A. Abdo ◽  
Scott N. Evans ◽  
Cyprien Bosserelle

Coral Reefs ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1297-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina R. Bornt ◽  
Dianne L. McLean ◽  
Tim J. Langlois ◽  
Euan S. Harvey ◽  
Lynda M. Bellchambers ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael G Hamblin

The three-dimensional form of a coral reef develops through interactions and feedbacks between its constituent organisms and their environment. Reef morphology therefore contains a potential wealth of ecological information, accessible if the relationships between morphology and ecology can be decoded. Traditionally, reef morphology has been attributed to external controls such as substrate topography or hydrodynamic influences. Little is known about inherent reef morphology in the absence of external control. Here we use reef growth simulations, based on observations in the cellular reefs of Western Australia’s Houtman Abrolhos Islands, to show that reef morphology is fundamentally determined by the mechanical behaviour of the reef-building organisms themselves—specifically their tendency to either remain in place or to collapse. Reef-building organisms that tend to remain in place, such as massive and encrusting corals or coralline algae, produce nodular reefs, whereas those that tend to collapse, such as branching Acropora, produce cellular reefs. The purest reef growth forms arise in sheltered lagoons dominated by a single type of reef builder, as in the branching Acropora-dominated lagoons of the Abrolhos. In these situations reef morphology can be considered a phenotype of the predominant reef building organism. The capacity to infer coral type from reef morphology can potentially be used to identify and map specific coral habitat in remotely sensed images. More generally, identifying ecological mechanisms underlying other examples of self-generated reef morphology can potentially improve our understanding of present-day reef ecology, because any ecological process capable of shaping a reef will almost invariably be an important process in real time on the living reef.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael G Hamblin

The three-dimensional form of a coral reef develops through interactions and feedbacks between its constituent organisms and their environment. Reef morphology therefore contains a potential wealth of ecological information, accessible if the relationships between morphology and ecology can be decoded. Traditionally, reef morphology has been attributed to external controls such as substrate topography or hydrodynamic influences. Little is known about inherent reef morphology in the absence of external control. Here we use reef growth simulations, based on observations in the cellular reefs of Western Australia’s Houtman Abrolhos Islands, to show that reef morphology is fundamentally determined by the mechanical behaviour of the reef-building organisms themselves—specifically their tendency to either remain in place or to collapse. Reef-building organisms that tend to remain in place, such as massive and encrusting corals or coralline algae, produce nodular reefs, whereas those that tend to collapse, such as branching Acropora, produce cellular reefs. The purest reef growth forms arise in sheltered lagoons dominated by a single type of reef builder, as in the branching Acropora-dominated lagoons of the Abrolhos. In these situations reef morphology can be considered a phenotype of the predominant reef building organism. The capacity to infer coral type from reef morphology can potentially be used to identify and map specific coral habitat in remotely sensed images. More generally, identifying ecological mechanisms underlying other examples of self-generated reef morphology can potentially improve our understanding of present-day reef ecology, because any ecological process capable of shaping a reef will almost invariably be an important process in real time on the living reef.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael G Hamblin

The shapes and forms of coral reefs are generally attributed to external controls such as substrate topography or hydrodynamic influences. Little is known about inherent reef morphology in the absence of external control. Here we use reef growth simulations, based on observations in the cellular reefs of Western Australia’s Houtman Abrolhos Islands, to show that reef morphology is fundamentally determined by the mechanical behaviour of the reef-building organisms themselves—specifically their tendency to either remain in place or to collapse. A spectrum of realistic reef forms can be generated by varying a single parameter representing this characteristic. Reef-building organisms that tend to remain in place, such as massive and encrusting corals or coralline algae, produce nodular reefs, whereas those that tend to collapse, such as branching Acropora, produce cellular reefs. Inherent reef growth forms are best expressed in sheltered lagoons. The purest forms arise where a single type of reef builder prevails, as in the cellular reefs of the Abrolhos. In these cases reef morphology can be considered a phenotype of the predominant reef building organism.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael G Hamblin

The shapes and forms of coral reefs are generally attributed to external controls such as substrate topography or hydrodynamic influences. Little is known about inherent reef morphology in the absence of external control. Here we use reef growth simulations, based on observations in the cellular reefs of Western Australia’s Houtman Abrolhos Islands, to show that reef morphology is fundamentally determined by the mechanical behaviour of the reef-building organisms themselves—specifically their tendency to either remain in place or to collapse. A spectrum of realistic reef forms can be generated by varying a single parameter representing this characteristic. Reef-building organisms that tend to remain in place, such as massive and encrusting corals or coralline algae, produce nodular reefs, whereas those that tend to collapse, such as branching Acropora, produce cellular reefs. Inherent reef growth forms are best expressed in sheltered lagoons. The purest forms arise where a single type of reef builder prevails, as in the cellular reefs of the Abrolhos. In these cases reef morphology can be considered a phenotype of the predominant reef building organism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document