Sustained coral reef growth in the critical wave dissipation zone of a Maldivian atoll

Sea-level rise is expected to outpace the capacity of coral reefs to grow and maintain their wave protection function, exacerbating coastal flooding and erosion of adjacent shorelines and threatening coastal communities. Here we present a new method that yields highly-resolved direct measurements of contemporary reef accretion on a Maldivian atoll reef rim, the critical zone that induces wave breaking. Results incorporate the suite of physical and ecological processes that contribute to reef accumulation and show growth rates vary from 6.6 ± 12.5 mm.y−1 on the reef crest, and up to 3.1 ± 10.2 mm.y−1, and −0.5 ± 1.8 mm.yr−1 on the outer and central reef flat respectively. If these short-term results are maintained over decades, the reef crest could keep pace with current sea-level rise. Findings highlight the need to resolve contemporary reef accretion at the critical wave dissipation zone to improve predictions of future reef growth, and re-evaluate exposure of adjacent shorelines to coastal hazards.

Towards a dynamic approach of sequences of coral reef terraces

<p>Sequences of coral reef terraces result from the interplay between biogenic and clastic sedimentary production, relative sea level (RSL) variations, wave erosion and tectonic forcing. Reefal sequences are gold standard proxies for paleo-sea level and tectonic reconstructions, but their contribution is usually restricted to a bijective approach, correlating the single elevation and age of their inner edge to single sea level stands or coseismic offsets, and reciprocally. The increase of available data, such as coral datings and high resolution topography revealed major deviations from this bijective approach (corals from a single MIS on several terraces, and conversely, or MIS highstands not represented in a sequence).</p><p>The Cape Laundi sequence, Sumba island, Indonesia, demonstrates such deviations, with outcrops of corals from MIS 5e on as many as three terraces instead of a single terrace as commonly expected. A preliminar numerical model of coral reef terrace profile has been developed, integrating reef growth, wave erosion, RSL variations and tectonic deformation. The interplay between reef growth rate, tectonic displacements and RSL variations provides a plausible explanation for these numerous occurrences. The low growth rate of this reef appears to prevent coral from  saturating the accommodation space generated during sea level transgression, leading to the preservation of drowned platforms and reefal construction of similar age during regressions.</p><p>Preliminary results from numerical modeling reveal complex feedbacks between the processes shaping these morphologies. Tectonic deformation has a major influence on reef development, by favoring reef preservation at high uplift rates and controlling the available accommodation space for reef growth.. By taking into account the numerous feedbacks controlling reef morphology, we can investigate the significance of RSL variations, continuous and punctual rock uplift, biogenic activity, and clastic inputs on coral terrace morphology and chronostratigraphy. Our approach can bring crucial constraints to the rates and frequency of RSL variations. To do so, we further develop our numerical model in order to provide more robust insights on the controls of reefal sequences morphologies. </p>

The Origin of Modern Atolls: Challenging Darwin's Deeply Ingrained Theory

In 1842, Darwin identified three types of reefs: fringing reefs, which are directly attached to volcanic islands; barrier reefs, which are separated from volcanic islands by lagoons; and ring reefs, which enclose only a lagoon and are defined as atolls. Moreover, he linked these reef types through an evolutionary model in which an atoll is the logical end point of a subsiding volcanic edifice, as he was unaware of Quaternary glaciations. As an alternative, starting in the 1930s, several authors proposed the antecedent karst model; in this model, atolls formed as a direct interaction between subsidence and karst dissolution that occurred preferentially in the bank interiors rather than on their margins through exposure during glacial lowstands of sea level. Atolls then developed during deglacial reflooding of the glacial karstic morphologies by preferential stacked coral-reef growth along their margins. Here, a comprehensive new model is proposed, based on the antecedent karst model and well-established sea-level fluctuations during the last 5 million years, by demonstrating that most modern atolls from the Maldives Archipelago and from the tropical Pacific and southwest Indian Oceans are rooted on top of late Pliocene flat-topped banks. The volcanic basement, therefore, has had no influence on the late Quaternary development of these flat-topped banks into modern atolls. During the multiple glacial sea-level lowstands that intensified throughout the Quaternary, the tops of these banks were karstified; then, during each of the five mid-to-late Brunhes deglaciations, coral reoccupied their raised margins and grew vertically, keeping up with sea-level rise and creating the modern atolls.

EARLY–MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN SEASCAPE-SCALE AGGREGATION PATTERN OF SPONGE-RICH REEFS ACROSS THE LAURENTIA PALEOCONTINENT

ABSTRACT During the late Cambrian–Early Ordovician interval the predominant non-microbial reef builders were sponges or sponge-like metazoans. The lithological and faunal composition of Cambro-Ordovician sponge-dominated reefs have previously been analyzed and reviewed. Here we take the relationship between reef aggregation pattern at reef to seascape scale into account, and look for changes during the Early–Middle Ordovician interval, in which metazoans became dominant reef builders. In a comparison of sponge-rich reefs from eight sites of the Laurentia paleocontinent three different seascape level reef growth patterns can be distinguished: (1) mosaic mode of reef growth, where reefs form a complex spatial mosaic dependent on hard substrate; (2) episodic mode, where patch reefs grew exclusively in distinct unconformity bounded horizons within non-reefal lithological units that have a much larger thickness; and (3) belt-and-bank mode, where reefs and reef complexes grew vertically and laterally as dispersed patches largely independent from truncation surfaces. The distinct modes of growth likely represent specific reef forming paleocommunities, because they differ in content and abundance of skeletal metazoan framebuilders, bioturbation intensity of non-skeletal reef sediment matrix, and in association of reef growth with underlying hard substrate. We suggest, based on a review of Laurentian reef occurrences, that the mosaic mode dominated in Early Ordovician strata and that the dominance shifted toward the belt and bank mode from Middle Ordovician strata onward.