factor price equalization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

116
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claustre Bajona ◽  
Timothy J Kehoe

In models in which convergence in income levels across closed countries is driven by faster accumulation of a productive factor in the poorer countries, opening these countries to trade can stop convergence and even cause divergence. We make this point using a dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin model — a combination of a static two-good, two-factor Heckscher-Ohlin trade model and a two-sector growth model — with infinitely lived consumers where international borrowing and lending are not permitted. We obtain two main results: First, countries that differ only in their initial endowments of capital per worker may converge or diverge in income levels over time, depending on the elasticity of substitution between traded goods. Divergence can occur for parameter values that would imply convergence in a world of closed economies and vice versa. Second, factor price equalization in a given period does not imply factor price equalization in future periods.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claustre Bajona ◽  
Timothy J Kehoe

In models in which convergence in income levels across closed countries is driven by faster accumulation of a productive factor in the poorer countries, opening these countries to trade can stop convergence and even cause divergence. We make this point using a dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin model — a combination of a static two-good, two-factor Heckscher-Ohlin trade model and a two-sector growth model — with infinitely lived consumers where international borrowing and lending are not permitted. We obtain two main results: First, countries that differ only in their initial endowments of capital per worker may converge or diverge in income levels over time, depending on the elasticity of substitution between traded goods. Divergence can occur for parameter values that would imply convergence in a world of closed economies and vice versa. Second, factor price equalization in a given period does not imply factor price equalization in future periods.


Norteamérica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Carbajal-De-Nova

The main purpose of this paper is to estimate the pace and extent of the manufacturing wage gap for production and nonsupervisory workers between Mexico and the United States. In addition, a main tenet of international trade is being evaluated. The Factor Price Equalization (FPE) theorem is put to test for the pre-NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement) period of 1987-1994 and two NAFTA sub-periods, i.e., 1995-2006 and 2007-2013. Following the above-mentioned theorem, trade openness should render wages in both countries comparable and eventually converging. The estimation technique used to test this theorem relies on an error correction model in a time series setting, using monthly data. The introduction of a real exchange rate as an exogenous variable becomes relevant. A substantial wage gap between production workers is found, as convergence has not taken place. As a result, the FPE theorem is not valid for the present case. The wage gap between production workers remains to be substantial, with a tendency to expand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document