J arch: A contemporary soft-tissue landmark for anatomic placement of femoral tunnel in remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Objectives: Femoral tunnel placement is a critical step in ACL reconstruction surgery. Surgeons usually end up clearing the soft tissue to access the bony landmarks. Biological ACL reconstruction with preservation of soft tissue can be done with reliable soft tissue landmarks. Our objective is to assess the reliability of a soft tissue landmark- femoral ACL remnant, for appropriate femoral tunnel placement in soft tissue preserving ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 40 consecutive patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction in January 2018 by a single surgeon. An inverse J shaped tissue arch was identified and used as soft tissue landmark for anatomic placement of femoral tunnel. This arch was a part of femoral ACL remnant. MRI films were examined post-operatively to determine the position of the femoral tunnel. Postoperatively, MRI of these patients were reviewed to evaluate the femoral tunnel position in terms of depth and height from the proximal condylar surface and notch roof, respectively. Results: The center of the femoral tunnel was found to be at a mean depth of 27.12 ± 2.2% from the proximal condylar surface (parallel to Blumensaat’s line) and a mean height of 30.96 ± 2.75% from the notch roof (perpendicular to Blumensaat’s line), which is at par with previously defined data given by various studies. Conclusion: J arch can be used as a dependable soft tissue landmark and a guide for the anatomic placement of femoral tunnel in biological ACL Reconstruction.

Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Ruler-Assisted Positioning of the Femoral Tunnel Relative to the Posterior Apex of the Deep Cartilage: A Single-Center Case Series

The techniques available to locate the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have notable limitations. To evaluate whether the femoral tunnel center could be located intraoperatively with a ruler, using the posterior apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) as a landmark. This retrospective case series included consecutive patients with ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction at the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tongren Hospital between January 2014 and May 2018. During surgery, the ADC of the femoral lateral condyle was used as a landmark to locate the femoral tunnel center with a ruler. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was performed within 3 days after surgery to measure the femoral tunnel position by the quadrant method. Arthroscopy was performed 1 year after surgery to evaluate the intra-articular conditions. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were determined before and 1 year after surgery. The final analysis included 82 knees of 82 patients (age = 31.7 ± 6.1 years; 70 males). The femoral tunnel center was 26 ± 1.5% in the deep-shallow (x-axis) direction and 31 ± 3.1% in the high-low (y-axis) direction, close to the “ideal” values of 27 and 34%. Lysholm score increased significantly from 38.5 (33.5–47) before surgery to 89 (86–92) at 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). IKDC score increased significantly from 42.5 (37–47) before surgery to 87 (83.75–90) after surgery (p < 0.001). Using the ADC as a landmark, the femoral tunnel position can be accurately selected using a ruler.

Failure Analysis in Patients With Patellar Redislocation After Primary Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become a popular surgical procedure to address patellofemoral instability. As a consequence of the growing number of MPFL reconstructions performed, a higher rate of failures and revision procedures has been seen. Purpose: To perform a failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing revision surgery for reinstability after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction were included. Clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic data, information on the primary surgery, and the mechanism of patellar redislocation (traumatic vs nontraumatic). Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding femoral tunnel position and the prevalence of anatomic risk factors (ARFs) associated with patellofemoral instability: trochlear dysplasia (types B through D), patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index >1.2, patellotrochlear index <0.28), lateralization of the tibial tuberosity (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance >20 mm, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament [TT-PCL] distance >24 mm), valgus malalignment (mechanical valgus axis >5°), and torsional deformity (internal femoral torsion >25°, external tibial torsion >35°). The prevalence of ARF was compared between patients with traumatic and nontraumatic redislocations and between patients with anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Results: A total of 26 patients (69% female) with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years were included. The cause of redislocation was traumatic in 31% and nontraumatic in 69%. Position of the femoral tunnel was considered nonanatomic in 50% of patients. Trochlear dysplasia was the most common ARF with a prevalence of 50%, followed by elevated TT-PCL distance (36%) and valgus malalignment (35%). The median number of ARFs per patient was 3 (range, 0-6), and 65% of patients had 2 or more ARFs. Patients with nontraumatic redislocations showed significantly more ARFs per patient, and the presence of 2 or more ARFs was significantly more common in this group. No significant difference was observed between patients with anatomic versus nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Conclusion: Multiple anatomic risk factors and femoral tunnel malposition are commonly observed in patients with reinstability after primary MPFL reconstruction. Before revision surgery, a focused clinical examination and adequate imaging including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standing full-leg radiographs, and torsional measurement with computed tomography or MRI are recommended to assess all relevant anatomic parameters to understand an individual patient’s risk profile. During revision surgery, care must be taken to ensure anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel through use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement: An Analysis of the Intended Versus Achieved Position for 221 International High-Volume ACL Surgeons

Background: Femoral tunnels that are not anatomically placed within the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint during ACL reconstruction are associated with residual instability, graft rupture, and poor clinical outcomes. Although surgeons may intend to place their femoral tunnels within the native ACL attachment, this is not always achieved. This study assesses the variation between intended and achieved femoral tunnel positions in a large cohort of experienced ACL surgeons. Hypothesis: The accuracy with which experienced ACL surgeons achieve their intended femoral tunnel position is dependent on viewing portal, localization strategy, and drilling technique. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 221 surgeons indicated their intended femoral tunnel location on a true lateral radiograph of a cadaveric knee specimen and a scaled photograph. Each surgeon then arthroscopically demonstrated the femoral tunnel on the specimen. The position was captured using fluoroscopy. The Euclidean distance (the straight-line distance between 2 points) between the intended and achieved tunnel positions, referenced to a grid applied to the lateral femoral condyle, was compared. Data were analyzed according to surgeons’ viewing portal (anteromedial [AM] or anterolateral [AL]), tunnel localization strategy (offset aimer, estimation from landmarks, ACL ruler, or C-arm fluoroscopy), and stated drilling technique (transtibial, AM portal, or outside-in). Results: Surgeons who viewed the lateral intercondylar notch wall through the AM portal were closer (mean distance, 9.5) to their intended position than those who viewed through the AL portal (mean distance, 15.1; P < .0001). By localization strategy, the mean distance between achieved and intended tunnel positions was greater for surgeons who used an offset aimer (14.5) and estimated the femoral tunnel position (12.9) than for those using a malleable ACL ruler (8.1; P < .0001) and fluoroscopy (4.3; P < .0001). Surgeons’ preferred drilling technique (AM portal, transtibial, or outside-in) had no effect on distance between intended and achieved positions. However, the mean achieved position was higher in the intercondylar notch for those using transtibial drilling ( P < .042). Conclusion: Surgeons using the AM portal to view the femoral attachment site were closer to their intended tunnel position than those who viewed it with the arthroscope in the AL portal. Surgeons who used fluoroscopy to localize femoral tunnel position were the closest to their intended position. Those who used estimation or an offset aimer had the farthest distance between achieved and intended tunnel positions. Clinical Relevance: Although accurate tunnel placement can be achieved using any method, given the disparity between intended and achieved tunnel positions, it may be advisable, even for high-volume surgeons, to verify the placement of their tunnels using either fluoroscopy or a malleable ACL ruler to ensure that they achieve their intended position. Fluoroscopy may be particularly useful for cases where the native femoral stump is no longer visible and for revisions. Viewing through the AM portal is recommended to aid accuracy of tunnel placement.

Influence of Risky Pathoanatomy and Demographic Factors on Clinical Outcomes After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Regression Analysis

Background: Multiple studies have demonstrated that a number of demographic and pathoanatomic characteristics are associated with patellofemoral instability, recurrence of instability, and less satisfactory results following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R). Despite the growing volume of research, the relationship of risk factors to patient-reported outcome after MPFL-R is unclear. Purpose: To determine if certain pathoanatomic and demographic factors predict disease-specific quality-of-life outcome after isolated MPFL-R for symptomatic patellofemoral instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study analyzed 224 isolated MPFL-Rs. Demographic data were collected, including age at first dislocation, sex, and presence of bilateral instability. Pathoanatomic risk factors included the presence of high-grade trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta ratio, Beighton score, and patellar tilt. Other factors included femoral tunnel position accuracy and WARPS/STAID score. Descriptive analyses were conducted, followed by calculation of individual Spearman rank correlation coefficients for the predictor variables versus the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) scores. A multivariable regression with stepwise selection was employed to establish the final model predicting BPII score, with all significant variables for alpha ≤ .05 included in the final model. Results: The cohort of 224 patients included 66 (29.5%) males and 158 (70.5%) females, with a mean age of 24.1 years and a mean body mass index of 23.9 kg/m2. The mean age of first patellar dislocation was 15.7 years, and 41.4% of patients had bilateral instability. Pathoanatomic variables within the cohort included the following: high-grade trochlear dysplasia = 41%; mean TT-TG = 14.6 mm, with 16.8% of patients demonstrating a TT-TG ≥18 mm; mean Caton-Deschamps ratio = 1.09, with 22% of patients demonstrating a ratio ≥1.2; and positive Beighton score = 37.5%. The mean BPII score at postoperative 2 years was 67.1 out of 100. A stepwise elimination in the regression model demonstrated no statistically significant 3- or 2-way relationships. Assessment of individual variables indicated that bilateral symptoms ( P = .004), higher age at first dislocation ( P = .024), and femoral tunnel position >10 mm from the Schöttle point ( P = .042) were statistically significant predictors of lower quality-of-life scores. The R2 value for the regression analysis model was 0.07. Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients undergoing isolated MPFL-R for symptomatic lateral patellofemoral instability, a multivariable forward stepwise regression demonstrated that bilateral symptoms, femoral tunnel position, and age at first dislocation were statistically significant predictors of lower postoperative BPII scores. No anatomic risk factors were predictive of quality-of-life outcome score 2 years after MPFL-R surgery. The R2 value indicated that there were many other important contributing factors affecting BPII outcome scores than those explored in this study.

How anatomical is our tunnel? A three dimensional CT evaluation of femoral tunnel in anatomic anteromedial single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> ACL reconstruction has become a common orthopaedic procedure. The anatomy and biomechanics of ACL have been one of the most researched and debated topics in the orthopaedic literature. This has implication on the surgical procedure too with shift from traditional transtibial to more anatomic anteromedial ACL reconstruction. Anteromedial technique results in more anatomic femoral tunnel with graft positioned at the native insertion site. The tunnel position is crucial for better outcome after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to ascertain the femoral tunnel position made by anatomic single bundle reconstruction with the help of three dimensional computer tomography.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective case series involving thirty patients with ACL tear who underwent anteromedial single bundle ACL reconstruction. Computer tomography scans were performed on thirty knees that underwent single bundle anteromedial ACL reconstruction. Three dimensional models were created and the data was analyzed according to coordinate system method. Femoral tunnel position was measured in proximal to distal and posterior to anterior directions. This data was compared with the already published reference data on anatomical tunnel position.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Femoral tunnel centre on the medial wall of lateral femoral condyle was located at 35±9% in the posterior to anterior direction. In the proximal to distal direction, the tunnel was placed at 30±12%. Femoral tunnel was placed anteriorly as compared to anatomic anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel position. There was no significant difference in tunnel position in proximal to distal direction.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Femoral tunnel centre on the medial wall of lateral femoral condyle was located at 35±9% in the posterior to anterior direction. In the proximal to distal direction, the tunnel was placed at 30±12%. Femoral tunnel was placed anteriorly as compared to anatomic anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel position. There was no significant difference in tunnel position in proximal to distal direction.</p>