Immunogenetic response to a malaria-like parasite in a wild primate

Malaria is infamous for the massive toll it exacts on human life and health. In the face of this intense selection, many human populations have evolved mechanisms that confer some resistance to the disease, such as sickle-cell hemoglobin or the Duffy null blood group. Less understood are adaptations in other vertebrate hosts, many of which have a longer history of co-evolution with malaria parasites. By comparing malaria resistance adaptations across host species, we can gain fundamental insight into host-parasite co-evolution. In particular, understanding the mechanisms by which non-human primate immune systems combat malaria may be fruitful in uncovering transferable therapeutic targets for humans. However, most research on primate response to malaria has focused on a single or few loci, typically in experimentally-infected captive primates. Here, we report the first transcriptomic study of a wild primate response to a malaria-like parasite, investigating gene expression response of red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus tephrosceles) to natural infection with the malaria-like parasite, Hepatocystis. We identified colobus genes with expression strongly correlated with parasitemia, including many implicated in human malaria and suggestive of common genetic architecture of disease response. For instance, the expression of ACKR1 (alias DARC) gene, previously linked to resistance in humans, was found to be positively correlated with parasitemia. Other similarities to human parasite response include induction of changes in immune cell type composition and, potentially, increased extramedullary hematopoiesis and altered biosynthesis of neutral lipids. Our results illustrate the utility of comparative immunogenetic investigation of malaria response in primates. Such inter-specific comparisons of transcriptional response to pathogens afford a unique opportunity to compare and contrast the adaptive genetic architecture of disease resistance, which may lead to the identification of novel intervention targets to improve human health.Author SummaryThe co-evolutionary arms race between humans and malaria parasites has been ongoing for millennia. Fully understanding the evolved human response to malaria is impossible without comparative study of parasites in our non-human primate relatives. Though laboratory primates are fruitful models, the complexity of wild primates infected in a natural transmission system may be a more suitable comparison for contextualizing malaria infections in human patients. Here, we investigate the genetic mechanisms underlying the immune response to Hepatocystis, a close relative of human-infective malaria, in a population of wild Ugandan red colobus monkeys. We find that the genes involved have considerable overlap with those active in human malaria patients. Like Plasmodium, Hepatocystis induces changes in blood cell type and may cause the host to produce blood components outside of the bone marrow or alter metabolism related to the production of lipids. Our work helps to identify the genetic mechanisms underlying the arms race between primates and malaria parasites, providing fundamental evolutionary insight. Such comparative work on the interaction between wild non-human primates and malaria parasites can identify ways in which primates have evolved resistance to malaria parasites, and further investigation of such implicated genes may lead to novel potential therapeutic and vaccine targets.

Feeding competition inferred from patch depletion in a supergroup of Rwenzori black-and-white colobus monkeys (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii) in Rwanda

Competition for food is often a cost associated with living in a group, and can occur in an indirect (scramble) or direct (contest) form. We investigated feeding competition in a supergroup of Rwenzori black-and-white colobus monkeys (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii) in Rwanda, with the aim of establishing whether freedom from scramble competition allows these monkeys to form supergroups. We used the patch depletion method, measuring intake rate coupled with movement rate, to assess if food patches become depleted over the occupancy period. Resource depletion was evident when the colobus fed on young leaves, but not when feeding on mature leaves. Scramble competition was inferred from a negative correlation between group size and change in intake rate over patch occupancy. Between-group contest competition was inferred from displacement from patches. Although feeding competition exists for select resources, limited competition for mature leaves may enable Rwenzori colobus to live in a supergroup of hundreds of individuals in this montane forest.