martin boundary
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

141
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 223 (2) ◽  
pp. 759-809
Author(s):  
Ilya Gekhtman ◽  
Victor Gerasimov ◽  
Leonid Potyagailo ◽  
Wenyuan Yang

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-884
Author(s):  
Peter A. Loeb
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-136
Author(s):  
Marc Kesseböhmer ◽  
Tony Samuel ◽  
Karenina Sender

2019 ◽  
Vol 155 (6) ◽  
pp. 1171-1193
Author(s):  
Sara Malacarne ◽  
Sergey Neshveyev

Given a free unitary quantum group $G=A_{u}(F)$, with $F$ not a unitary $2\times 2$ matrix, we show that the Martin boundary of the dual of $G$ with respect to any $G$-${\hat{G}}$-invariant, irreducible, finite-range quantum random walk coincides with the topological boundary defined by Vaes and Vander Vennet. This can be thought of as a quantum analogue of the fact that the Martin boundary of a free group coincides with the space of ends of its Cayley tree.


2019 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 1429-1449
Author(s):  
Minoru Murata ◽  
Tetsuo Tsuchida

AbstractWe consider a second-order elliptic operator L in skew product of an ordinary differential operator L1 on an interval (a, b) and an elliptic operator on a domain D2 of a Riemannian manifold such that the associated heat kernel is intrinsically ultracontractive. We give criteria for criticality and subcriticality of L in terms of a positive solution having minimal growth at η (η = a, b) to an associated ordinary differential equation. In the subcritical case, we explicitly determine the Martin compactification and Martin kernel for L on the basis of [24]; in particular, the Martin boundary over η is either one point or a compactification of D2, which depends on whether an associated integral near η diverges or converges. From this structure theorem we show a monotonicity property that the Martin boundary over η does not become smaller as the potential term of L1 becomes larger near η.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document