weakly pseudoconvex domain
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850025
Author(s):  
Sayed Saber

Let [Formula: see text] be a complex manifold of dimension [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be a weakly pseudoconvex domain with smooth boundary in [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] be a holomorphic line bundle over [Formula: see text] which is positive on a neighborhood of [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] be the [Formula: see text]-times tensor product of [Formula: see text] for positive integer [Formula: see text]. The purpose of this paper is to study the [Formula: see text]-problem with support conditions in [Formula: see text] for forms of type [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] with values in [Formula: see text]. Applications to the [Formula: see text]-problem for smooth forms on boundaries of [Formula: see text] are given.


2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-474
Author(s):  
GIUSEPPE DELLA SALA ◽  
ALBERTO SARACCO

AbstractLet A be a domain of the boundary of a (weakly) pseudoconvex domain Ω of ℂn and M a smooth, closed, maximally complex submanifold of A. We find a subdomain E of ℂn, depending only on Ω and A, and a complex variety W⊂E such that bW=M in E. Moreover, a generalization to analytic sets of depth at least 4 is given.


Author(s):  
David Crocker ◽  
Iain Raeburn

AbstractLet Ω be the weakly pseudoconvex domainand let ∂Ω be its boundary. If ϕ ∈ L∞ (∂Ω), we denote by Tϕ, the Toephtz operator with symbol ϕ acting on the Hardy space H2(∂Ω), and by J(∂Ω) the C*-subalgebra of B(H2(∂Ω)) generated by the Toeplitz operators with continuous symbol. Our main theorem asserts that J(∂Ω) contains the ideal K of all compact operators on H2(∂Ω), and that the symbol map ϕ→Tϕ induces an isomorphism of C(∂Ω) onto the quotient C*-algebra ℑ(∂Ω)/K. Similar results have been established before for other domains, and in particular when Ω is strongly pseudoconvex. The main interest of our results lies in their proofs: ours are elementary, whereas those used in the strongly pseudoconvex case depend heavily on the theory of the tangential Cauchy-Riemann operator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document