Nichtgebrauch vermeiden – Physiotherapie nach Ablatio mammae

Die Brust gilt als Symbol der Weiblichkeit. Nach einer Krebserkrankung müssen sich Frauen oft gezwungenermaßen von einer oder beiden Brüsten trennen. Ein Trauma, das auch Physiotherapeuten neben ihren klassischen Maßnahmen wie der Behandlung des Arms und der Lymphdrainage berücksichtigen sollten.

Primary and secondary prophylactic nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy (NSSM): A retrospective single-center analysis.

162 Background: Given a strict indication the NSSM is a oncologically safe surgical procedure and allows breast reconstructive interventions with a good cosmetic result. With regard to prophylactic mastectomy (PM) the (radical) ablatio mammae is so far regarded as the therapy of choice, since a maximal removement of the breast glandular tissue seems ensured. So far, it is unclear if NSSM is a oncologically safe treatment option also in the context of prophylactic surgery. The introduction of new materials for tissue extension in plastic-reconstructive interventions such as porcine acellular dermis (Strattice) or titanized polypropylene meshes (TiLoopBra) permits the reconstruction of the natural breast shape and size and thus the preservation of the body integrity also in prophylactic operations. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the PM performed at the Department of OB/GYN of the TU München (Munich, Germany) between 01/2005 and 12/2011 (76 cases). Primary PM were done in 13 cases due to positive family history (n=3), BRCA mutations (n=9) or at the request of the patient (n=1). 63 breast cancer patients were operated (secondary contralateral mastectomies) because of a positive familiy history (n=21), BRCA mutations (n=17) or high need for security (n=25). 19 mastectomies and 57 NSSMs were performed. With all NSSMs an instant reconstruction was done (17x expander, 25x implants, 1x TRAM, 14x DIEP), in 42 patients using a tissue extension (titanized poylpropylene meshes or acellular dermis). 9 patients with ablatio mammae received a breast reconstruction. Results: There was a continuous increase in prophylactic operations and NSSMs over the past five years. In four patients there was a coincidental pathological finding diagnosed in the healthy breast (2x DCIS, 1x Ca, 1x CLIS). In the group of primary prophylactic operated patients there were no (pre-)cancerous lesions found. In the secondary PM patients there were no recurrences, secondary cancers or metastases. Conclusions: In conclusion there was no difference between both surgical techniques with regard to oncologic safety. As far as breast reconstructive possibilities are concerned there are clear advantages in NSSM.