Laryngospasm Caused by Removal of Nasogastric Tube after Tracheal Extubation: Case Report

Background: We report a case of laryngospasm during nasogastric tube removal. Laryngospasm is a severe airway complication after surgery and there have been no reports associated with the removal of nasogastric tubes. Case Report: After abdominal surgery, the patient was extubated the tracheal tube, and was removed the nasogastric tube. Thereafter patient went into respiratory arrest. We attempted to ventilate using a face mask, and then through a supraglottic device, but both attempts were unsuccessful. Finally, we re-intubated her and stabilized her vitals. Conclusion: When patients are in emerging from anesthesia, nasogastric tube withdrawal may cause irritation of the vocal cords by gastric acids, and thereby, provoke laryngospasm. This can be avoided by removing it before reversing anesthesia or after the patient is awake.

The differential for chest pain: when the most common cause is not the answer-a case of de novo esophageal bezoar

Background Having a broad differential and knowing how to manage the different possibilities in a patient with chest pain is important. Esophageal bezoars are rare entities and are even less common in patients without any recent hospitalizations, known achalasia, or nasogastric tubes. Despite their rarity, having it in one’s differential, and knowing how to manage it is important. Case presentation This case presents a patient with mega-esophagus secondary to an esophageal bezoar; and runs through the gamut of morbid chest pathophysiology, its differential, work-up, and management. The case is interesting in that the patient’s initial presentation brings to mind a bevy of feared chest issues to include myocardial infarction, dissection, pulmonary embolus, achalasia, and perforation. Conclusion This clinical case highlights more than just the rare diagnosis of esophageal bezoar. It also goes through initial resuscitation, key concerns, “can’t miss diagnoses”, and finally discusses the feared end state of an esophageal perforation.

Malposition of a Nasogastric Feeding Tube Into the Right Pleural Cavity of a Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patient After Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy: A Case Report

Background: Nasogastric feeding tube plays an important role in nutrition intake, drug administration, and stomach emptying for patients with severe dysphagia. However, inserting nasogastric tubes is not absolutely harmless. Inadvertent malposition into the trachea or the pleural cavity could result in severe pulmonary complications. Case presentation: We present a case of a 67-year-old patient with a history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and after the treatment of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nasogastric tubes have to be placed for enteral nutrition and avoiding aspiration owing to his severe dysphagia. Unfortunately, he experienced a malposition of nasogastric tube into the right pleura cavity after blind replacement by nurse, whereas the nurses and physicians did not recognize this fault, even the bedside chest radiography (X-ray) was performed twice after intubation. A week later, his condition deteriorated so rapidly that he had to undergo tracheotomy, and the tube was finally found in his trachea.Conclusions: The Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be fully evaluated before the nasogastric tube placement whether the blind insertion is suitable or not. Meanwhile, we should not feed immediately unless we have a radiograph to verify the right position of NG tube. Furthermore, careful monitoring of both typical and untypical symptoms of malposition is essential during tube feeding.

SP5.1.3 Analysis of National Bariatric Surgery Related Clinical Incidents: Lessons Learned and a Proposed Safety Checklist for Bariatric Surgery

Background Hundreds of thousands of patient-safety clinical incidents are reported to the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) database in the UK every year. The purpose of this study was to identify bariatric surgery-related learning points from these incidents. Methods We analyzed bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents reported to the UK NRLS database between 01 April 2005 and 31st October 2020. The authors used their experience to identify learning themes and design a safety checklist. Results We identified 541 bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents in 58 different themes. Preoperative incidents represented 30.3% (N = 164), intraoperative 38.1% (N = 206), and postoperative accounted for 31.6% (N = 171). In terms of severity of incidents, (150;27.7%) were of high severity, whereas medium and low severity incidents were (244;45.1%) and (147;27.2%) respectively. The most commonly reported high severity theme was failure of thromboprophylaxis (50;9.2%). Intraoperative high severity incidents included 17 incidents of stapling of orogastric/nasogastric tubes or temperature probes, 8 missed needles, 8 broken graspers, and 6 incidents of band parts left behind. Postoperatively, the most commonly reported high severity theme was improper management of diabetes mellitus (35;6.5%). Medications errors represented a significant proportion of the medium severity incidents and included (26;4.8%) incidents of improper or missed prescription of routine medications and anticoagulants preoperatively and (45;8.3%) wrong prescriptions, dosage or prescribing of contraindicated medications postoperatively. Conclusion We identified 58 specific themes of bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents. We proposed specific recommendations for each incidents theme in addition to a bariatric safety checklist to help improve the safety of bariatric surgery worldwide.

EP.WE.135Analysis of National Bariatric Surgery Related Clinical Incidents

Background Hundreds of thousands of patient-safety clinical incidents are reported to the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) database in the United Kingdom (UK) every year. The purpose of this study was to identify bariatric surgery-related learning points from these incidents. Methods We analysed bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents reported to the UK NRLS database between 01 April 2005 and 31st October 2020. Results We identified 541 bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents in 58 different themes. Preoperative incidents represented 30.31% (N = 164), intraoperative 38.09% (N = 206), and postoperative accounted for 31.61% (N = 171). In terms of severity of incidents, (150;27.7%) were of high severity, whereas medium and low severity incidents were (244;45.1%) and (147;27.2%) respectively. The most common high severity theme was failure of thromboprophylaxis (50;9.2%). Intraoperative high severity incidents included 17 incidents of stapling of orogastric/nasogastric tubes or temperature probes, 8 missed needles, 8 broken graspers, and 6 incidents of band parts left behind. Postoperatively, the most common high severity theme was improper management of diabetes mellitus (DM) (35;6.5%). Medications errors represented a significant proportion of the medium severity incidents and included (26;4.8%) incidents of improper or missed prescription of routine medications and anticoagulants preoperatively and (45;8.3%) wrong prescriptions, dosage or prescribing of contraindicated medications postoperatively. Among the low severity themes identified there were (23;4.3%) incidents of postoperative diet problems, and (19;3.5%) patients listed for wrong procedures. Conclusion We identified 58 specific themes of bariatric surgery-related clinical incidents. Awareness of these themes should help to improve the safety of bariatric surgery worldwide.