COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND FENTANYL ON AIRWAY RESPONSE AND HEMODYNAMICS DURING TRACHEAL EXTUBATION

Background: Extubation is associated with various circulatory and airway responses. Various pharmacological measures including fentanyl and dexmedetomidine have been used to blunt the reflex without compromising the spontaneous respiration. In this study we wanted to compare dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on airway response, smoothness of extubation and hemodynamic changes. Methodology: A total of 68 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, were randomized into two groups. Group A received dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg and Group B received 1 mcg/kg of fentanyl with the start of skin suturing over a period of 10 minutes via syringe pump. Airway reflex during suction and smoothness of extubation were assessed. Level of sedation during suction, extubation and then every 5 minutes post extubation for 15 minutes were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed every 5 minutes with start of test solution till extubation and then every 5 minutes for 15 minutes. Results: A total of 68 patients were evaluated in the study. In dexmedetomidine group, 67.6% of patients had no cough on extubation while in fentanyl group 35.3% of patients had no cough on extubation which was statistically significant (p value 0.015). Mean heart rate during extubation increased in both the groups but the increase was 39% in Group B and 11% in Group A from baseline which was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). There was rise in mean systolic and mean arterial pressure during extubation in both the groups but the increase was significantly higher in fentanyl group. Patients in dexmedetomidine group were more sedated but there were no any adverse events. Conclusion: With the results obtained from the study, it is concluded that dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg over 10 minutes before extubation is effective in alleviating airway response and haemodynamics compared to fentanyl 1 mcg/kg.

Comparative Evaluation of Vibratory Physiotherapy Methods in the Early Period after Cardiac Surgery

Postoperative respiratory complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery occur in 20‒30% cases, and the most of them can be associated with ineffective cough and bronchial mucus evacuation.The objective. Comparative assessment of effectiveness and safety of methods for stimulating the evacuation of bronchial secretions using oscillatory PEP-therapy (Acapella Duet), oscillatory chest compression insufflator-aspirator “Comfort Cough Plus”, and the traditional method of manual chest percussion in the early period after cardiac surgery.Subjects and Methods. The prospective study included 120 cardiac surgery patients. They were divided into 3 groups (40 in each), depending on the type of the applied respiratory procedure. Distribution into groups was carried out by random selection. All procedures were performed 10‒12 hours after tracheal extubation. Before the procedure and 20 minutes after it, the efficiency of sputum discharge was assessed, gas exchange indices on room air breathing and maximum inspiratory lung capacity (MILC) were measured.Results. Ineffective bronchial mucus evacuating in the early period after tracheal extubation was observed in 86.7% of the patients. A single procedure of both PEP-therapy (Group 1) and mechanical cough stimulation (Group 2) led to improved sputum passage, as evidenced by an increase in the number of patients with productive cough by 4.25 times (p < 0.0009) and 5.3 times (p < 0.0007), respectively. In patients of Groups 1 and 2, an increase in MILC was observed (by 42.2% and 60.0%, respectively, p = 0.000001), the difference between the groups was statistically significant. In Control Group 3, with manual physiotherapy, the average increase in MILC was only 11.6%. Mechanical respiratory therapy procedures led to significant improvement in gas exchange variables, as evidenced by an increase in SpO2 in Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.000009 and 0.000001, respectively) and a decrease in the proportion of patients with impaired oxygenating lung function (SpO2 below 92%) by 11 and 12 times, respectively (p < 0.01). The most significant changes were revealed in case of mechanical stimulation with aspirator-insufflator due to combination of two methods (oscillatory chest compression and lung inflation). In Control Group, no significant changes of gas exchange variables were observed.Conclusion: Mechanical vibratory methods for stimulating the bronchial secretion evacuation have significant advantages over classical manual chest massage in patients after cardiac surgery. Their positive effect on sputum passage, ventilatory parameters and gas exchange was noted, and the most pronounced effect was observed after oscillatory chest compression with insufflator-aspirator. The procedures were well tolerated and there were no complications associated with them.

Laryngospasm Caused by Removal of Nasogastric Tube after Tracheal Extubation: Case Report

Background: We report a case of laryngospasm during nasogastric tube removal. Laryngospasm is a severe airway complication after surgery and there have been no reports associated with the removal of nasogastric tubes. Case Report: After abdominal surgery, the patient was extubated the tracheal tube, and was removed the nasogastric tube. Thereafter patient went into respiratory arrest. We attempted to ventilate using a face mask, and then through a supraglottic device, but both attempts were unsuccessful. Finally, we re-intubated her and stabilized her vitals. Conclusion: When patients are in emerging from anesthesia, nasogastric tube withdrawal may cause irritation of the vocal cords by gastric acids, and thereby, provoke laryngospasm. This can be avoided by removing it before reversing anesthesia or after the patient is awake.

Comparison of Intravenous Lignocaine and Esmolol in Attenuating Hemodynamic Response and Cough Reflex during Extubation in Hypertensive Patients under General Anaesthesia

Tracheal extubation carries higher complication rates compared to intubation during general anaesthesia (GA). Thus, various drugs are used to attenuate hemodynamic responses and cough reflex during extubation. We investigated if intravenous (IV) lignocaine and esmolol, given prior extubation, was able to achieve that in hypertensive patients under GA. In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled study, 68 hypertensive patients on treatment undergoing GA were analysed. Group L received IV lignocaine 1 mg/kg while Group E received IV esmolol 1.5 mg/kg, 2 minutes before extubation. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at the following interval: before study drug administration (T-0), prior extubation (T-1), 1 minute (T-2), 3 minutes (T-3), 5 minutes (T-4) and 10 minutes (T-5) post-extubation. Group L showed significantly increase in HR at T-2 while SBP and MAP increased significantly from T-1 until T-5. Group E showed a significant reduction in HR at T-1 up to T-5 and significantly lower HR at T-1 and T-2 compared to Group L. Group E showed stable SBP, DBP and MAP at all intervals. In conclusion, IV esmolol at 1.5 mg/kg was able to attenuate the hemodynamic response more pronounced when compared to IV lignocaine at 1 mg/kg from extubation stress in patients with hypertension on treatment. Both lignocaine and esmolol were equally effective in suppressing cough reflex during extubation.

Recovery Profiles of Sevoflurane and Desflurane with or without M-Entropy Guidance in Obese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Obesity increases the risk of prolonged emergence from general anesthesia due to the delayed release of anesthetic agents from body fat. This trial aimed to evaluate the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane along with anesthetic depth monitoring on emergence time from anesthesia in obese patients. Adults with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg·m−2 undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a medical center were randomized into four groups: sevoflurane or desflurane anesthesia with or without M-Entropy guidance on anesthetic depth in a ratio of 1:1:1:1. In the M-Entropy guidance groups, the dosage of sevoflurane and desflurane was adjusted to achieve response and state entropy values between 40 and 60 during surgery. In the non-M-Entropy guidance groups, the dosage of anesthetics was titrated according to clinical signs. Primary outcome was time to spontaneous eye opening. A total of 80 participants were randomized. Compared to sevoflurane, desflurane anesthesia significantly reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening [mean difference (MD): −129 s; 95% confidence interval (CI): −211, −46], obeying commands (−160; −243, −77), tracheal extubation (−172; −266, −78), and leaving operating room (−148; −243, −54). M-Entropy guidance further reduced time to eye opening (MD: −142 s; 99.2% CI: −276, −8), tracheal extubation (−199; −379, −19), and leaving operating room (−190; −358, −23) in the desflurane but not the sevoflurane group. M-Entropy guidance significantly reduced the risk of agitation during emergence, i.e., risk difference: −0.275 (95% CI: −0.464, −0.086); and number needed to treat: 4. Compared to sevoflurane, using desflurane to maintain general anesthesia accelerated the return of consciousness in obese patients. M-Entropy guidance further hastened awakening in patients using desflurane and prevented emergence agitation.

Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Labetalol for Their Effectiveness in Suppression of Haemodynamic Response during Extubation

Background: Tracheal extubation causes autonomic nervous system disturbances which causes tachycardia, hypertension which are harmful in susceptible patients.so we conducted a study between iv Dexmedetomidine and iv Labetalol to assess their effectiveness in decreasing haemodynamic disturbances during extubation. Materials and Methods:we included 100 participants of age of 18-55 yrs with ASA grading I & II and divided them into 2 groups. Group D was given injection Dexmedetomidine 0.6mcg/kg iv and Group L was given injection Labetalol 0.25mg/kg body weight. We recorded Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at baseline, 2,5,8 minutes post drug injection, at extubation and 1,3,5,8,10 and 15 minutes after extubation. Results: Group D had better decreased heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at the time of extubation, and also 15 minutes post extubation in comparison to Group L. Conclusion: Injection Dexmedetomidine 0.6µg/kg has showed a better attenuating effect on sympathoadrenal system during extubation than injection Labetalol 0.25mg/kg Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, labetalol, extubation,hemodynamics.

Anesthesia Clinical Outcome and Management in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Anesthetic technique and outcome of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is not well established. Objective: To evaluate the anesthetic management of CRS with HIPEC and to analyze whether supplement epidural anesthesia will provide any benefit on the outcomes. Materials and Methods: All patients that underwent CRS with HIPEC between January 2008 and December 2017 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were retrospective reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups, 1) received a combination of epidural and general anesthesia (EGA), and 2) received general anesthesia (GA) to compare intraoperative hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain control, time to tracheal extubation, and postoperative complications between groups. Results: Twenty patients had EGA, and 14 patients had GA. EGA group had significant more incidences of intraoperative hypotension at 70% versus 21.4%, which required more use of vasopressor at 65% versus 21.4% (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference between groups in total blood loss, time to extubation, and ICU length of stay. There were no significant differences in the pain score at 12 and 24 hours postoperative. Epidural complications were not detected. There was no mortality within 30 days. Conclusion: Adding epidural analgesia to GA in CRS with HIPEC increased the incidence of hypotension and did not reduce the pain or duration of extubation. Keywords: Anesthesia; Epidural; HIPEC; Outcome

Occurrence and Severity of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort of General Anesthesia Plus Epidural Anesthesia vs. General Anesthesia in Abdominal Operation With Urinary Catheterization: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Background: This randomized, controlled study aimed to investigate the effect of general anesthesia plus epidural anesthesia on catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) in patients who underwent abdominal operation with urinary catheterization.Methods: A total of 150 patients scheduled for abdominal operation under anesthesia with urinary catheterization were randomized to receive general anesthesia plus epidural anesthesia (N = 74, GA + EA group) or general anesthesia (N = 76, GA group). The occurrence and severity of CRBD, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded at 0 hour (h), 0.5, 1, and 3 h after tracheal extubation. Besides, postoperative adverse events were assessed.Results: The occurrence and severity of CRBD at 0, 0.5, 1, and 3 h were all reduced in GA + EA group compared to GA group (all P &lt; 0.05). Meanwhile, subgroup analyses showed that the reduction of occurrence and severity of CRBD in GA + EA group compared to GA group was more obvious in male patients and patients ≥50 years. Besides, SBP at 0, 0.5, 1, and 3 h, as well as DBP at 0, 0.5, and 3 h were all decreased in GA + EA group compared to GA group (all P &lt; 0.05), while HR was increased at 0 h in GA + EA group compared to GA group (P = 0.034). Moreover, the occurrence of pain, severity of pain and occurrence of vomiting were similar between GA + EA group and GA group (all P &gt; 0.05).Conclusion: General anesthesia plus epidural anesthesia decreases CRBD occurrence and severity with tolerable safety compared with general anesthesia in patients who undergo abdominal operation with urinary catheterization.