fumigation extraction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Nativ Rotbart ◽  
Mikhail Borisover ◽  
Nadezhda Bukhanovsky ◽  
Anna Beriozkin ◽  
Gil Eshel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nativ Rotbart ◽  
Mikhail Borisover ◽  
Nadezhda Bukhanovsky ◽  
Alla Nasonova ◽  
Asher Bar-Tal ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Min Hui ◽  
Yu Ding ◽  
Xin Ying Wang ◽  
Yang Zhuang ◽  
Ji Fei Xu

Selecting rhizosphere soil as the object of study which from 5 different kinds of plants in the Inner Mongolia University campus, we use fumigation extraction method and liquid chlorine fumigation extraction-water bath method to determine the microbial biomass carbon in the rhizosphere soil of different plants, in order to compare that whether or not liquid chlorine fumigation extraction-water bath method applicable to this type of soil sample. The results show that, there are significant differences in the rhizosphere soil microbial biomass carbon of 5 different kinds of plants, determination results is that Pyrus sorotina (LS) > Platycladus orientalis (CB) > Prunus persica (TS)> Syringa vulgaris (DX) > Pinus tabuliformis (YS), the content of P. sorotina is highest, 260.53 mg/kg, and P. tabulaeformis is lowest, 121.11 mg/kg, the differ is 139.42 mg/kg. There is a big gap between the measure values of the two methods, so that liquid chlorine fumigation extraction-water bath method doesn’t apply to the determination of this type microbial biomass carbon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document