static pricing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Scholz ◽  
Roman-David Kulko

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to (1) investigate the effect of freshness on consumers' willingness to pay, (2) derive static and dynamic pricing strategies and (3) compare the effect of these pricing strategies on a retailer's revenue and food waste. This investigation helps to reveal the potentials of dynamic pricing strategies for building more sustainable business models.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conduct an online experiment to measure consumers' willingness to pay for fresh and three-days’ old strawberries. The impact of freshness on willingness to pay is analysed using univariate tests and regression analysis. Pricing strategies are compared using a Monte Carlo simulation.FindingsThe results of this study show that freshness largely determines consumers' willingness to pay and price sensitivity. This renders dynamic pricing a promising strategy from an economic point of view. The results of the simulation study show that food waste can be reduced by up to 53.6% with a dynamic pricing instead of a static pricing strategy in the case that there are as many consumers as strawberry packages in the inventory. Revenue can be increased by up to 10% compared to a static pricing strategy based on fresh strawberries.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that food retailers can improve their revenue when switching from static to dynamic pricing. Furthermore, in most cases, food retailers can reduce food waste with a dynamic instead of a static-pricing strategy, which might help to improve their image through a more sustainable business model and attract additional consumers.Originality/valueThis study is the first to analyse the possibility of using food freshness to design a dynamic pricing strategy and to analyse the impact of such a pricing strategy on both, a retailer's revenue and a retailer's food waste.


Author(s):  
Michael A. Salinger

AbstractThe new U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Vertical Merger Guidelines focus on how vertical mergers are likely to affect static pricing incentives. While vertical mergers can create incentives to increase prices, they can also provide incentives to decrease prices. Which of the possible outcomes is likely to occur depends on details that are generally difficult to measure. Potential competition between dominant firms, the theory of potential harm to competition that the 1984 Department of Justice Merger Guidelines stressed, remains a more compelling rationale for blocking vertical mergers than the likely effect on static pricing incentives.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Besbes ◽  
Adam N. Elmachtoub ◽  
Yunjie Sun

A Simple and Near-Optimal Static Pricing Policy for Reusable Resources


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Soppert ◽  
Claudius Steinhardt ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Jochen Gönsch

Author(s):  
Omar Besbes ◽  
Adam N. Elmachtoub ◽  
Yunjie Sun
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 266-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiong Zhang ◽  
Liyan Lei ◽  
Shichen Zhang ◽  
Lijun Song
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ellström ◽  
Martin Hoshi Larsson

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand differences between open-book accounting (OBA) using static prices and OBA using dynamic prices. The authors identify how these differences influence various aspects of customer–supplier relationships. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a case study involving a builders’ merchant and a wood manufacturer in the UK. The builders’ merchant under discussion has recently outsourced part of its production to the aforementioned wood manufacturer by using OBA with dynamic prices. For this case study, the authors have conducted interviews with multiple people from both parties in the agreement. Additional illustrative cases are provided through a study of other qualitative papers on OBA. Findings The authors find evidence supporting that, when dynamic prices are used in OBA, risk (unpredictability) is shifted from the supplier to the customer. Also, the customer frequently focuses on the supplier’s costs, both parties often aim for a long-term relationship and the customer becomes more dependent on the supplier, causing high interdependence. Furthermore, empirical evidence suggests that the customer finds price less important, and the reallocation of activities between the customer and supplier is easier in OBA setups in which dynamic prices are used. Originality/value This paper provides the first study of how differences between dynamic and static prices in OBA influence the customer–supplier relationship. This paper adds to the developing literature on OBA, in particular, as well as to literature on pricing, in general.


2012 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Caro ◽  
David Simchi-Levi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document