reconstructed breast
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

102
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 100112
Author(s):  
Sarah I Landau ◽  
Jeffrey L Roberson ◽  
Emna Bakillah ◽  
Julia Tchou

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Beatriz Elena Adrada ◽  
Niloofar Karbasian ◽  
Monica Huang ◽  
Gaiane Maia Rauch ◽  
Piyanoot Woodtichartpreecha ◽  
...  

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the biological markers more frequently associated with recurrence in the reconstructed breast, to evaluate the detection method, and to correlate recurrent breast cancers with the detection method. Material and Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study was conducted at a single institution on 131 patients treated with mastectomy for primary breast cancer followed by breast reconstruction between 2005 and 2012. Imaging features were correlated with clinical and pathologic findings. Results: Of the 131 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 40 patients presented with breast cancer recurrence. The most common histopathologic type of primary breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma in 82.5% (33/40) of patients. Triple-negative breast cancer was the most common biological marker with 42.1% (16/38) of cases. Clinically, 70% (28/40) of the recurrences presented as palpable abnormalities. Of nine patients who underwent mammography, a mass was seen in eight patients. Of the 35 patients who underwent ultrasound evaluation, an irregular mass was found in 48.6% (17/35) of patients. Nine patients with recurrent breast cancer underwent breast MRI, and MRI showed an irregular enhancing mass in four patients, an oval mass in four patients, and skin and trabecular thickening in one patient. About 55% of patients with recurrent breast cancer were found to have distant metastases. Conclusion: Patients at higher risk for locoregional recurrence may benefit from imaging surveillance in order to detect early local recurrences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 715e-719e
Author(s):  
Miguel De la Parra-Marquez ◽  
Ricardo Fernandez-Riera ◽  
Elizabeth Romay-Chambers ◽  
Tomas Escamilla Linaje

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemen Lovšin ◽  
Uroš Ahčan ◽  
Andrej Lapoša

Abstract Aims The purpose of secondary breast reconstruction is to restore patient’s integrity. Autologous breast reconstruction has become the superior method of breast reconstruction, especially in cases with inadequate skin envelope and post-radiotherapy tissue damage. A 3D-template-enhanced secondary autologous breast reconstruction with restoration of innervation was developed at our department. Methods Thirty patients are planned to be included in the prospective double-blinded study. The reconstruction is performed with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap using 3D template from the contralateral healthy breast. Additionally, coaptation of the anterior branch of the 3rd intercostal nerve with the dominant lateral intercostal nerve innervating the DIEP flap is performed. Breast-Q questionnaires are collected before and after the reconstruction and the breast sensation is assessed on regular intervals. Results The preliminary results show an improvement in the sensation of the reconstructed breast and higher patient satisfaction score. Prior to abstract submission, no significant complications have been noted, in one patent abnormal sensation of the breast was reported. Conclusions According to previous studies, patients with innervated free flap reconstruction express higher level of satisfaction as the sensation of the reconstructed breast contributes significantly to the level of satisfaction. Furthermore, use of 3D model from the contralateral breast produces results that are superior to traditional methods. Preliminary results showed that the combination of both methods improved patient satisfaction regarding the aesthetic outcome and functional result. With the appropriate patient selection this type of optimised breast reconstruction should be performed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 737-746
Author(s):  
Alexis M. Ruffolo ◽  
William J. Bruce ◽  
Timothy H. F. Daugherty ◽  
Jason Lee ◽  
Nicole Z. Sommer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document