EP.TH.286Optimisation of Secondary Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemen Lovšin ◽  
Uroš Ahčan ◽  
Andrej Lapoša
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Intercostal Nerve ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Reconstructed Breast

Abstract Aims The purpose of secondary breast reconstruction is to restore patient’s integrity. Autologous breast reconstruction has become the superior method of breast reconstruction, especially in cases with inadequate skin envelope and post-radiotherapy tissue damage. A 3D-template-enhanced secondary autologous breast reconstruction with restoration of innervation was developed at our department. Methods Thirty patients are planned to be included in the prospective double-blinded study. The reconstruction is performed with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap using 3D template from the contralateral healthy breast. Additionally, coaptation of the anterior branch of the 3rd intercostal nerve with the dominant lateral intercostal nerve innervating the DIEP flap is performed. Breast-Q questionnaires are collected before and after the reconstruction and the breast sensation is assessed on regular intervals. Results The preliminary results show an improvement in the sensation of the reconstructed breast and higher patient satisfaction score. Prior to abstract submission, no significant complications have been noted, in one patent abnormal sensation of the breast was reported. Conclusions According to previous studies, patients with innervated free flap reconstruction express higher level of satisfaction as the sensation of the reconstructed breast contributes significantly to the level of satisfaction. Furthermore, use of 3D model from the contralateral breast produces results that are superior to traditional methods. Preliminary results showed that the combination of both methods improved patient satisfaction regarding the aesthetic outcome and functional result. With the appropriate patient selection this type of optimised breast reconstruction should be performed.

scholarly journals The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyandra Parikesit ◽  
Mark Ashton
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Tram Flap ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Aesthetic Appearance ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator

Background: The continuing advances in breast reconstruction surgery allows for high expectation of excellent outcomes and long-term aesthetic appearance. Transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap has been the flap of choice in breast reconstructions for decades, however it sacrifices muscle and causes donor site complication. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is now the preferred flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction, because it holds some advantages over TRAM. This study aim to review, summarize, and discuss the current knowledge of DIEP flap in breast reconstruction.Method: Literature research conducted through Pubmed, Medline, and SCOPUS databases for published articles up to the year 2009. A total of 808 articles were found, and 60 articles reviewed.Result: Women with thick subcutaneous fat and skin on the lower abdomen are the most appropriate candidates for autologous breast reconstruction. Patients might be given oral analgesics instead of intravenous, because DIEP results in less postoperative pain than TRAM. Patients are commonly discharged on the 6–7th day post operation after DIEP flaps. In spite of several reports that DIEP flap has low complication rates, necrosis is the most common and often leads to poor cosmetic outcome.Conclusion: DIEP flap essentially combines all the advantages of TRAM flap without most of its disadvantages. Some complications may occur in smaller percentage. Although DIEP flap has a high patient satisfaction score, it does not mean that it is definitely superior to other methods of autologous breast reconstruction.

Assessing the Influence of Failed Implant Reconstruction on Patient Satisfaction and Decision Regret after Salvage Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie L. Shammas ◽  
Amanda R. Sergesketter ◽  
Mahsa Taskindoust ◽  
Sonali Biswas ◽  
Scott T. Hollenbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Decision Regret ◽  
History Of ◽  
Implant Reconstruction

Abstract Background Free-flap breast reconstruction after failed implant reconstruction is associated with improved patient outcomes. How the level of satisfaction achieved compares between patients with and without previously failed implant reconstruction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of prior failed implant-based reconstruction on long-term patient-reported outcomes after free-flap breast reconstruction. Methods All patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q and decisional regret using the Decision Regret Scale were compared between patients with and without a history of implant breast reconstruction. Results Overall, 207 patients were contacted and 131 completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. A total of 23 patients had a history of failed implant-based reconstruction requiring free-flap-flap salvage, most commonly due to infection (39.1%), chronic pain (34.8%), capsular contracture (26%), and implant malposition (26.1%). Following definitive free-flap reconstruction, patients with prior failed implant reconstruction had significantly lower BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with breast (61.2 ± 16.7 vs. 70.4 ± 18.7; p = 0.04) and sexual well-being (38.5 ± 18.2 vs. 52.8 ± 24.7; p = 0.01) and reported higher decision regret (19.1 ± 18.6 vs. 9.6 ± 15.6, respectively). There were no significant differences for psychosocial well-being (p = 0.67), physical well-being (chest; p = 0.27), and physical well-being (abdomen; p = 0.91). Conclusion A history of failed implant-based reconstruction is associated with reduced satisfaction and increased decision regret with the final reconstructive outcome. This data underscores the importance of appropriate patient selection at the initial consultation, and informed preoperative counseling regarding long-term outcomes in patients presenting for free-flap reconstruction after a failed implant-based reconstruction.

scholarly journals Refractory Donor-Site Seroma Following DIEP Breast Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2513826X1989883
Author(s):  
Trina V. Stephens ◽  
Nancy Van Laeken ◽  
Sheina A. Macadam
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
First Line ◽  
Percutaneous Aspiration ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
History Of ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi Flaps

Donor-site seroma formation is a complication of autologous breast reconstruction reported most commonly with the use of latissimus dorsi flaps. First-line treatment is percutaneous aspiration which leads to resolution in the majority of cases. Those that persist may progress to a chronic, refractory seroma, which can prove challenging in terms of treatment. The aim of this article is to provide an updated literature review of interventions for chronic donor-site seroma and present the case of a 65-year-old female with a recalcitrant abdominal seroma following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Literature review revealed a single article that reported 2 cases of persistent donor-site seroma after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The patient presented here underwent repeat aspiration, drain placement, and multiple surgical procedures to achieve resolution. In total, the post-reconstruction seroma history of the patient extended over approximately 14 months. We conclude with evidence-based suggestions for chronic, donor-site seroma prevention and treatment.

How Does Autologous Breast Reconstruction Impact Downtime?

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (07) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rais ◽  
Jian Farhadi ◽  
Giovanni Zoccali
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Autologous Reconstruction ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Superior Gluteal Artery ◽  
Free Flap Surgery ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
Time Required ◽  
The Impact

Background Although autologous breast reconstruction is technically quite demanding, it offers the best outcomes in terms of durable results, patient perceptions, and postoperative pain. Many studies have focused on clinical outcomes and technical aspects of such procedures, but few have addressed the impact of various flaps on patient recovery times. This particular investigation entailed an assessment of commonly used flaps, examining the periods of time required to resume daily activities. Methods Multiple choice questionnaires were administered to 121 patients after recovery from autologous reconstruction to determine the times required in returning to specific physical activities. To analyze results, the analysis of variance F-test was applied, and odds ratios (ORs) were determined. Results Among the activities surveyed, recovery time was not always a function of free-flap surgery. Additional treatments and psychological effects also contributed. Adjuvant chemotherapy increased average downtime by 2 weeks, and postoperative irradiation prolonged recovery as much as 4 weeks. Patient downtime was unrelated to flap type, ranging from 2.9 to 21.3 weeks for various activities in question. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps yielded the highest OR and transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps the lowest. Conclusion Compared with superior gluteal artery perforator and TUG flaps, the DIEP flap was confirmed as the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction, conferring the shortest recovery times. All adjuvant therapies served to prolong patient recovery as well. Surgical issues, patient lifestyles, and donor-site availability are other important aspects of flap selection.

The laparoscopically harvested omentum as a free flap for autologous breast reconstruction

Microsurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tert C. van Alphen ◽  
Maarten R. Fechner ◽  
Jeroen M. Smit ◽  
Gerrit D. Slooter ◽  
Coralien L. Broekhuysen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after delayed breast reconstruction using DIEP flap: a 10 years’ follow-up survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
Berit Kristine Skraastad ◽  
Cathrine Knudsen ◽  
Catherine Jackson ◽  
Tor Paaske Utheim ◽  
Are Hugo Pripp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Delayed Breast Reconstruction

Changes to Venous Flow Coupler Signal during DIEP Flap Inset Can Be Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 466-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih Colakoglu ◽  
Ariel Johnson ◽  
Jaclyn Anderson ◽  
David Woodbridge Mathes ◽  
Tae Woon Chong
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Signal Loss ◽  
Venous Anastomosis ◽  
Venous Flow ◽  
Venous Signal

Abstract Background Venous flow couplers are typically used to monitor free flaps during the postoperative period, with a continuous venous signal available immediately after completion of the anastomosis. Intraoperative loss of the coupler signal is not uncommon and may require adjustments in free flap inset and even flap thickness to get the venous signal to return. The effects of intraoperative coupler signal loss and the role of this technology on flap outcomes have not been evaluated. We hypothesized that the use of intraoperative coupler can be protective of both early and late flap complications by preventing unfavorable flap insets. Patients and Methods All patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and June 2019 by single microsurgery team were included. Flap inset and inset changes based on flow coupler signal problems were reviewed in the procedure notes. Patient demographics data and clinical outcomes were analyzed with comprehensive chart review. Results Forty-four consecutive patients with 69 free flaps were identified. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or venous coupler size used in venous anastomosis. Although the number of operating room take backs for venous insufficiency was not significantly different between two groups, the free flaps with inset change had significantly higher complications that required later surgical intervention (p = 0.0464). Conclusion Surgeons should be aware that intraoperative coupler signal loss can be associated with poor clinical outcomes postoperatively and these flaps may require more perfusion imaging, flap debulking, or even additional venous anastomosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document