auditory spatial cues
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David LK Murphy ◽  
Cynthia D King ◽  
Stephanie N Schlebusch ◽  
Christopher A Shera ◽  
Jennifer M Groh

AbstractEye movements alter the relationship between the visual and auditory spatial scenes. Signals related to eye movements affect the brain’s auditory pathways from the ear through auditory cortex and beyond, but how these signals might contribute to computing the locations of sounds with respect to the visual scene is poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the information contained in the signals observed at the earliest processing stage, eye movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs). We report that human EMREOs carry information about both horizontal and vertical eye displacement as well as initial/final eye position. We conclude that all of the information necessary to contribute to a suitable coordinate transformation of auditory spatial cues into a common reference frame with visual information is present in this signal. We hypothesize that the underlying mechanism causing EMREOs could impose a transfer function on any incoming sound signal, which could permit subsequent processing stages to compute the positions of sounds in relation to the visual scene.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Kumpik ◽  
Connor Campbell ◽  
Jan W.H. Schnupp ◽  
Andrew J King

AbstractSound localization requires the integration in the brain of auditory spatial cues generated by interactions with the external ears, head and body. Perceptual learning studies have shown that the relative weighting of these cues can change in a context-dependent fashion if their relative reliability is altered. One factor that may influence this process is vision, which tends to dominate localization judgments when both modalities are present and induces a recalibration of auditory space if they become misaligned. It is not known, however, whether vision can alter the weighting of individual auditory localization cues. Using non-individualized head-related transfer functions, we measured changes in subjects’ sound localization biases and binaural localization cue weights after ~55 minutes of training on an audiovisual spatial oddball task. Four different configurations of spatial congruence between visual and auditory cues (interaural time differences (ITDs) and frequency-dependent interaural level differences (interaural level spectra, ILS) were used. When visual cues were spatially congruent with both auditory spatial cues, we observed an improvement in sound localization, as shown by a reduction in the variance of subjects’ localization biases, which was accompanied by an up-weighting of the more salient ILS cue. However, if the position of either one of the auditory cues was randomized during training, no overall improvement in sound localization occurred. Nevertheless, the spatial gain of whichever cue was matched with vision increased, with different effects observed on the gain for the randomized cue depending on whether ITDs or ILS were matched with vision. As a result, we observed a similar up-weighting in ILS when this cue alone was matched with vision, but no overall change in binaural cue weighting when ITDs corresponded to the visual cues and ILS were randomized. Consistently misaligning both cues with vision produced the ventriloquism aftereffect, i.e., a corresponding shift in auditory localization bias, without affecting the variability of the subjects’ sound localization judgments, and no overall change in binaural cue weighting. These data show that visual contextual information can invoke a reweighting of auditory localization cues, although concomitant improvements in sound localization are only likely to accompany training with fully congruent audiovisual information.


2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
pp. EL369-EL374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Best ◽  
Elin Roverud ◽  
Christine R. Mason ◽  
Gerald Kidd

Author(s):  
Fei Tian ◽  
Yasunori Kinosada ◽  
Kazumitsu Shinohara

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (22) ◽  
pp. E2339-E2348 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. H. Remme ◽  
R. Donato ◽  
J. Mikiel-Hunter ◽  
J. A. Ballestero ◽  
S. Foster ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (14) ◽  
pp. 1291-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Keating ◽  
Johannes C. Dahmen ◽  
Andrew J. King

2011 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 2313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Naylor ◽  
S. Gert Weinrich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document