selective caries removal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan E. Clarkson ◽  
Craig R. Ramsay ◽  
David Ricketts ◽  
Avijit Banerjee ◽  
Chris Deery ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life. In the UK most adults experience dental caries during their lifetime and the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey reported that 85% of adults have at least one dental restoration. Conservative removal of tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration, complex fracture as well as remaining tooth surfaces being less vulnerable to further caries. However, despite its prevalence there is no consensus on how much caries to remove prior to placing a restoration to achieve optimal outcomes. Evidence for selective compared to complete or near-complete caries removal suggests there may be benefits for selective removal in sustaining tooth vitality, therefore avoiding abscess formation and pain, so eliminating the need for more complex and costly treatment or eventual tooth loss. However, the evidence is of low scientific quality and mainly gleaned from studies in primary teeth. Method This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm patient randomised controlled clinical trial including an internal pilot set in primary dental care in Scotland and England. Dental health professionals will recruit 623 participants over 12-years of age with deep carious lesions in their permanent posterior teeth. Participants will have a single tooth randomised to either the selective caries removal or complete caries removal treatment arm. Baseline measures and outcome data (during the 3-year follow-up period) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases. A mixed-method process evaluation will complement the clinical and economic outcome evaluation and examine implementation, mechanisms of impact and context. The primary outcome at three years is sustained tooth vitality. The primary economic outcome is net benefit modelled over a lifetime horizon. Clinical secondary outcomes include pulp exposure, progession of caries, restoration failure; as well as patient-centred and economic outcomes. Discussion SCRiPT will provide evidence for the most clinically effective and cost-beneficial approach to managing deep carious lesions in permanent posterior teeth in primary care. This will support general dental practitioners, patients and policy makers in decision making. Trial Registration Trial registry: ISRCTN. Trial registration number: ISRCTN76503940. Date of Registration: 30.10.2019. URL of trial registry record: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76503940?q=ISRCTN76503940%20&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.


2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 104988
Author(s):  
Nailê Damé-Teixeira ◽  
Laís Daniela Ev ◽  
Luciana Bitello-Firmino ◽  
Vanessa Kern Soares ◽  
Raquel Soares Dalalba ◽  
...  

Dental Update ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 841-847
Author(s):  
Bhupinder Dawett ◽  
Sarah Young ◽  
Chris Deery ◽  
Avijit Banerjee

Dental caries remains a significant health problem globally, causing morbidity in those affected and consuming health resources. The management of caries consumes considerable finances both for individuals and the public purse. The scientific understanding of the dental caries process has evolved considerably over the last four decades with a move towards a minimum intervention oral care (MIOC) approach to managing patients. The minimally invasive operative intervention that retains demineralised, caries-affected dentine under a well-sealed restoration in order to avoid instrumentation close to the pulp, has shown clinical efficacy in treating individual teeth, as part of the MIOC framework. However, implementation of the selective caries removal approach in deep lesions is still not thought to be practised routinely by clinicians both globally, and in the UK. This article discusses some of the issues that may account for this and describes a case study using this operative strategy. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Restoring deep carious lesions can be a challenge, but using selective caries removal approaches will help minimise the adverse effects of pulp trauma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 103416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Jobim Jardim ◽  
Heliana Dantas Mestrinho ◽  
Bárbara Koppe ◽  
Lilian Marly de Paula ◽  
Luana Severo Alves ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document