scholarly journals Restorations after selective caries removal: 5-Year randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 103416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Jobim Jardim ◽  
Heliana Dantas Mestrinho ◽  
Bárbara Koppe ◽  
Lilian Marly de Paula ◽  
Luana Severo Alves ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan E. Clarkson ◽  
Craig R. Ramsay ◽  
David Ricketts ◽  
Avijit Banerjee ◽  
Chris Deery ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life. In the UK most adults experience dental caries during their lifetime and the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey reported that 85% of adults have at least one dental restoration. Conservative removal of tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration, complex fracture as well as remaining tooth surfaces being less vulnerable to further caries. However, despite its prevalence there is no consensus on how much caries to remove prior to placing a restoration to achieve optimal outcomes. Evidence for selective compared to complete or near-complete caries removal suggests there may be benefits for selective removal in sustaining tooth vitality, therefore avoiding abscess formation and pain, so eliminating the need for more complex and costly treatment or eventual tooth loss. However, the evidence is of low scientific quality and mainly gleaned from studies in primary teeth. Method This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm patient randomised controlled clinical trial including an internal pilot set in primary dental care in Scotland and England. Dental health professionals will recruit 623 participants over 12-years of age with deep carious lesions in their permanent posterior teeth. Participants will have a single tooth randomised to either the selective caries removal or complete caries removal treatment arm. Baseline measures and outcome data (during the 3-year follow-up period) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases. A mixed-method process evaluation will complement the clinical and economic outcome evaluation and examine implementation, mechanisms of impact and context. The primary outcome at three years is sustained tooth vitality. The primary economic outcome is net benefit modelled over a lifetime horizon. Clinical secondary outcomes include pulp exposure, progession of caries, restoration failure; as well as patient-centred and economic outcomes. Discussion SCRiPT will provide evidence for the most clinically effective and cost-beneficial approach to managing deep carious lesions in permanent posterior teeth in primary care. This will support general dental practitioners, patients and policy makers in decision making. Trial Registration Trial registry: ISRCTN. Trial registration number: ISRCTN76503940. Date of Registration: 30.10.2019. URL of trial registry record: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76503940?q=ISRCTN76503940%20&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena C. Melgar ◽  
Niek J.M. Opdam ◽  
Marcos Britto Correa ◽  
Renata Franzon ◽  
Flávio Fernando Demarco ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the survival probability of selective caries removal (SCR) treatments in the primary teeth of children with high caries experience and factors potentially associated with treatment failure. Methods: The sample included SCR treatments conducted in anterior and posterior teeth without sedation or general anesthesia among children attending a university dental service. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the longevity of restorations and multivariate Cox regression with shared frailty was used to assess risk factors. Results: A total of 284 SCR treatments in 88 children (aged 5.2 ± 1.91 years) with high caries experience (mean dmft/DMFT = 11.1 ± 5.04) were analyzed. The 3-year survival reached 48.8%, with an annual failure rate of 21.2%. Restorative failures (n = 60) were found more frequently compared to pulp complications (n = 12). SCR performed in anterior primary teeth were more prone to failure (hazard ratio = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.94; 6.71). Patients with a higher amount of visible plaque experienced more failures in SCR treatments (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% CI:1.27; 7.07). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, SCR showed restricted survival when compared to other prospective clinical trials. Patient-related factors, especially the young age and high caries experience of the children, may represent a challenge for restoration survival. Regardless of the caries removal technique or restorative material, cariogenic biofilm has a negative effect on the survival of restorations, probably by acting directly on material deterioration and, particularly, on the development of new caries lesions of rapid progression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 103264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Schmidt ◽  
Laura Buenger ◽  
Sandra Krohn ◽  
René Kallies ◽  
Katharina Zeller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 847-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Casagrande ◽  
Alejandra Tejeda Seminario ◽  
Marcos Britto Correa ◽  
Stefanie Bressan Werle ◽  
Marisa Maltz ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Krause ◽  
Andreas Braun ◽  
Gabriele Lotz ◽  
Susanne Kneist ◽  
Søren Jepsen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document