direct defence
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-96
Author(s):  
Nina Perger

Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality, edited by Roman Kuhar and David Patternote, consists of various subchapters with a common theme – the analysis of anti-gender movements that are appearing and consolidating across Europe. According to the authors, the movements’ common background is an opposition to the so called ‘gender ideology’ or ‘gender theory’. In these anti-gender movements and campaigns, ‘gender ideology’ is perceived as an ideology that aims to destabilize and even destroy social values that are seen as cornerstones of Western civilization, namely, the notion of ‘biological sex’, heterosexuality, family, and freedom. To formulate it differently, ‘gender ideology’ is perceived to be socially dangerous because of the effect sexual and reproductive rights, women’s rights, and LGBTIQ+ rights have on the taken-for-granted and privileged status of heterosexuality and of a specific family form, that is, family with a ‘male’ and ‘female’ parent (‘heterosexual family’). Namely, with feminist and LGBTIQ+ movements (where LGBTIQ+ stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer people) and their accomplishments throughout history, heteronormativity cannot simply be taken for granted anymore; moreover, it is destabilized to such a degree that its explicit and direct defence is made necessary: its common sense status needs to be rebuilt and stabilized by ‘unmasking’ what ‘gender ideology’ supposedly stands for and by revealing its ‘threatening’ consequences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Zheng Huang ◽  
Yu-Tao Xiao ◽  
Tobias G. Köllner ◽  
Wei-Xia Jing ◽  
Jun-Feng Kou ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 700-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
JENNIFER PETZOLD-MAXWELL ◽  
SARAH WONG ◽  
CONSUELO ARELLANO ◽  
FRED GOULD

PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e5450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Ballhorn ◽  
Stefanie Kautz ◽  
Martin Heil ◽  
Adrian D. Hegeman

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E.M. van den Boom ◽  
T.A. van Beek ◽  
M. Dicke

AbstractPlants infested with the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, may indirectly defend themselves by releasing volatiles that attract the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Several plants from different plant families that varied in the level of spider mite acceptance were tested in an olfactometer. The predatory mites were significantly attracted to the spider mite-infested leaves of all test plant species. No differences in attractiveness of the infested plant leaves were found for predatory mites reared on spider mites on the different test plants or on lima bean. Thus, experience with the spider mite-induced plant volatiles did not affect the predatory mites. Jasmonic acid was applied to ginkgo leaves to induce a mimic of a spider mite-induced volatile blend, because the spider mites did not survive when incubated on ginkgo. The volatile blend induced in ginkgo by jasmonic acid was slightly attractive to predatory mites. Plants with a high degree of direct defence were thought to invest less in indirect defence than plants with a low degree of direct defence. However, plants that had a strong direct defence such as ginkgo and sweet pepper, did emit induced volatiles that attracted the predatory mite. This indicates that a combination of direct and indirect defence is to some extent compatible in plant species.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document